“西部地区随迁老人社区融入社会工作服务示范项目”的评估研究

发布时间：2018-06-03 21:05

本文选题：随迁老人 + 社会工作项目评估　；参考：《兰州大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：评估是一项贯穿于社会服务全过程的活动,有效的评估是引导行业和机构发展的重要手法。随着管理主义和“社会交代”潮流的兴起,社会工作评估成为社会工作服务中必不可少的一项工作。本研究主要通过对L市“随迁老人社区融入社会工作项目”执行情况、项目效果和项目内部评估的完整跟踪观察,发现本次项目的内部评估并不完善,存在着诸多问题,并不能真实、全面地监测项目的运行情况。基于这种情况,笔者引入了第三方评估,目的在于站在第三方的角度去评估项目的运行情况,通过与内评估的过程和结果进行对比分析,探讨两种社会工作项目评估方法的优劣,最终去反思我国现行通用的社会工作项目评估方法的有效性。笔者在参与观察的基础上,采用综合评估方法和对比分析方法,发现在对项目进行评估的时候,内评估单纯使用已有的服务资料和督导会议陈述作为评估依据,缺乏客观性,有失公允,而第三方也仅将服务内容和相关资料的作为评估依据,缺乏对服务各阶段的综合性的把握。这说明社会工作的两种评估方法均有一定的局限性。因此,只有将他们结合起来,才能更全面的把握项目,促进评估工作的有效性和完整性。
[Abstract]:Evaluation is an activity running through the whole process of social service, and effective evaluation is an important method to guide the development of industry and institutions. With the rise of managementism and the trend of "social accountability", social work evaluation has become an indispensable work in social work service. This study mainly through the "with the elderly community into the social work project" implementation situation, the project effect and the project internal evaluation complete follow-up observation, found this project internal evaluation is not perfect, there are many problems, It is not true and comprehensive to monitor the operation of the project. Based on this situation, the author introduces the third-party evaluation, the purpose of which is to evaluate the operation of the project from the perspective of the third party, and to compare and analyze with the process and results of the internal evaluation. This paper discusses the merits and demerits of the two social work project evaluation methods, and finally reflects on the effectiveness of the current social work project evaluation methods in our country. On the basis of taking part in the observation, the author adopts the comprehensive evaluation method and the comparative analysis method, and finds that in the evaluation of the project, the internal evaluation simply uses the existing service information and the statement of the supervisory meeting as the evaluation basis, and lacks the objectivity. It is unfair, but the third party only takes the service content and the related information as the evaluation basis, lacks the comprehensive grasp to the service each stage. This shows that the two methods of social work evaluation have some limitations. Therefore, only by combining them can we grasp the project more comprehensively and promote the effectiveness and integrity of the evaluation.
【学位授予单位】：兰州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：C916

【参考文献】