“期刊承认”VS“共同体承认”:我国学术知识生产动力机制的“悖论”

发布时间：2018-06-10 00:44

本文选题：科学社会学 + 知识生产　；参考：《学术交流》2010年01期

【摘要】："共同体的承认"是知识生产的根本动力,在西方"期刊承认"乃"共同体承认"的有机组成部分,学术人努力生产、发表创新性的知识以赢得"共同体的承认"。然而在我国,量化考评下的"期刊承认"并未得到大部分学术人的真正认同,已非"共同体承认"的一部分,学术人生产知识主要是为了取得形式化的"期刊承认"以满足各种实用性的目的,而非生产出创新性的知识以赢得实质性的"共同体承认","期刊承认"与"共同体承认"之间的冲突导致了我国学术知识生产动力机制的失灵。为了化解两者之间矛盾,我们一方面应使"同行评议"机制在各种学术评价活动中占据主导地位,另一方面要进一步完善学术期刊的"匿名评审"制度,以弥合"期刊承认"与"共同体承认"之间的断裂,从而真正激励学术知识的生产。
[Abstract]:"recognition of community" is the fundamental motive force of knowledge production. In the west, "recognition of journals" is an integral part of "recognition of community". Scholars make great efforts to produce and publish innovative knowledge in order to win recognition of "community". However, in China, the "journal recognition" under the quantitative evaluation has not been truly recognized by most scholars and is no longer part of the "Community recognition". Academic knowledge is produced primarily for the purpose of obtaining formal "journal recognition" for various practical purposes. Instead of producing innovative knowledge to win substantial "community recognition", the conflict between "journal recognition" and "community recognition" leads to the failure of the motive mechanism of academic knowledge production in China. In order to resolve the contradiction between the two, on the one hand, we should make the peer review mechanism dominate in all kinds of academic evaluation activities, on the other hand, we should further improve the "anonymous review" system of academic journals. In order to bridge the gap between journal recognition and community recognition, the production of academic knowledge can be really encouraged.
【作者单位】：上海大学社会学系;
【基金】：上海大学第三届研究生创新基金(SHUCX091069)项目
【分类号】：C092

【相似文献】