建造师职业偏差行为及其分类研究

发布时间：2018-06-25 14:50

本文选题：建造师 + 偏差行为　；参考：《天津大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：建造师作为建设工程施工管理直接负责人，其不良行为不仅对建筑企业，而且对工程项目及其众多利益相关者造成严重的危害。但现阶段对建造师不良行为的研究较为零散，理论基础匮乏。因此论文引入偏差行为定义，以“行为内涵界定——分类结构构建——行为现状调查”的研究思路对建造师职业偏差行为及其结构进行研究：由理论分析得出建造师作为企业职工及职业人员具有受聘于企业、受制于政府、受信于公众的多重角色属性，依次识别出偏差行为的边界包括组织约束、法律法规约束以及职业道德约束，，并结合建造师职业特点，从行为主体、客体、性质、结果的系统角度对建造师职业偏差行为的内涵进行界定；根据得出的建造师职业偏差行为约束及定义，通过访谈调查法、文献归纳法以及基于网络的头脑风暴法，分别从建筑企业、政府以及公众的角度识别出建造师职业偏差行为常见表现形式共36个。通过各职业偏差行为之间的异同，采用MDS结构分析方法，构建建造师职业偏差行为的空间维度结构，其中两个维度分别为“内部性－外部性”、“道德层面－制度层面”，四个类别为“工程破坏行为”、“内部失范行为”、“工作失德行为”和“职业失德行为”；依据得到的分类结构编制建造师职业偏差行为度量量表，通过预调查和前导调查对量表进行逐步修订，并验证其信度效度均在可接受范围。以此量表为测量工具，对来自北京、天津、广州、南京和重庆的建造师样本的职业偏差行为现状进行调查，并通过“以高频行为分布图例进行宏观层面的维度分析、以“钻石模型”进行中观层面的类别分析、以具体行为得分进行微观层面的行为分析”的系统分析框架对调查结果进行分析，最后给出建造师职业偏差行为治理的对策建议。
[Abstract]:As the direct responsible person in charge of construction management, the constructor's bad behavior causes serious harm not only to the construction enterprise, but also to the project and its many stakeholders. But at present, the research on the bad behavior of the constructors is scattered and the theoretical basis is scarce. Therefore, the definition of deviation behavior is introduced in this paper. This paper studies the occupational deviant behavior and its structure of the constructors with the idea of "defining the connotation of behavior-constructing the classified structure-investigation of the current situation of behavior": from the theoretical analysis, it is concluded that the constructor is the employee of the enterprise. And professional personnel who are employed in an enterprise, Restricted by the government, believed by the public's multi-role attribute, the boundary of the deviant behavior is identified in turn, including the organizational constraint, the law restriction and the professional ethics restriction, and the combination of the professional characteristics of the constructor, from the behavior subject, the object, the nature, Results the connotation of occupational deviation behavior of constructors was defined from a systematic perspective, and according to the constraints and definitions of occupational deviation behavior of constructors, the methods of interview, literature induction and brainstorming based on network were used. From the point of view of construction enterprises, government and the public, 36 common forms of professional deviant behavior of constructors are identified. By using MDS structure analysis method, the spatial dimension structure of professional deviation behavior of constructors is constructed through the similarities and differences between different occupational bias behaviors. The two dimensions are "internal-externality", "moral stratification and institutional level", respectively. The four categories are "engineering destructive behavior", "internal anomie behavior", "work unethical behavior" and "professional unethical behavior". The scale was revised step by pre-survey and lead survey, and the reliability and validity of the scale were in the acceptable range. The scale was used as a measurement tool to investigate the occupational bias behavior of the constructors from Beijing, Tianjin, Guangzhou, Nanjing and Chongqing, and to analyze the dimensions of macroscopical level by using the high-frequency behavior distribution map. The systematic analysis framework of "diamond model" and "concrete behavior score" is used to analyze the results of the investigation. Finally, the countermeasures and suggestions for the management of professional deviant behavior of the constructors are given.
【学位授予单位】：天津大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：F426.92;C913.2

【参考文献】