不同评价角色对人文社科成果评价的认识差异——基于问卷调查的分析
发布时间：2018-12-12 05:39
【摘要】：人文社会学术成果评价涉及不同的评价角色,掌握不同角色的认识差异对于完善评价机制至关重要。通过对问卷调查数据的方差分析发现,在大多数情况下,被评价者和评价研究者两类角色认为的评价问题严重程度,显著高于评审者和评价组织者两类角色所认为的严重程度;但不同评价角色对评价管控措施必要程度的认识则普遍无显著差异。
[Abstract]:The evaluation of academic achievements in humanities society involves different evaluation roles. It is very important to master the differences in understanding different roles in order to perfect the evaluation mechanism. Based on the analysis of variance of questionnaire data, it is found that, in most cases, the evaluation problems considered by the evaluator and the evaluation researcher are significantly higher than those of the evaluator and the evaluation organizer. However, there is no significant difference in the understanding of the necessary degree of evaluation control measures among different evaluation roles.
【作者单位】： 中国人民大学人文社会科学学术成果评价研究中心;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金青年项目“创新和质量导向的中国人文社科学术成果评价管理控制机制研究”(12CTQ022) 国家自然科学基金重点项目“我国信息资源产业发展策略及管理研究”(71133006)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：C1
[Abstract]:The evaluation of academic achievements in humanities society involves different evaluation roles. It is very important to master the differences in understanding different roles in order to perfect the evaluation mechanism. Based on the analysis of variance of questionnaire data, it is found that, in most cases, the evaluation problems considered by the evaluator and the evaluation researcher are significantly higher than those of the evaluator and the evaluation organizer. However, there is no significant difference in the understanding of the necessary degree of evaluation control measures among different evaluation roles.
【作者单位】： 中国人民大学人文社会科学学术成果评价研究中心;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金青年项目“创新和质量导向的中国人文社科学术成果评价管理控制机制研究”(12CTQ022) 国家自然科学基金重点项目“我国信息资源产业发展策略及管理研究”(71133006)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：C1
【参考文献】
中国期刊全文数据库 前1条
1 张琪;何华锋;郑建飞;李红增;;以质量为导向的高校教师学术评价机制初探[J];时代教育;2014年11期
【共引文献】
中国期刊全文数据库 前2条
1 王U，
本文编号：2374021
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/shgj/2374021.html
