城市发展的技术与文化导向研究
发布时间：2018-12-13 23:05
【摘要】：城市问题从产生到现在一直困扰着人们,理论界也一直在探索解决城市问题的方法,对于城市问题的研究多从政治经济、人类学、历史哲学、文化哲学等方面,而很少从技术与文化的角度研究。这样使得对城市发展的导向缺乏根本性的认识,本文本着一种技术与文化的视角,从特殊到一般,从城市的时间轴、城市的功能、城市的活性等方向来进行研究,试图揭示城市发展的导向轨迹和规律。 城市的产生依托新石器时期的贮存技术、建筑技术、驯化动植物和水利技术等,这些技术的产生为城市的发展奠定了物质基础。但是技术基础对城市发展仍是不足的,需要文化的代偿来弥补,而正是这种代偿产生了城市。在城市产生上有一种“先古的形式”在引导,这种“先古的形式”在文化统治技术时期形成了城市发展的典范,城市的本质便是继承这种代偿作用下弥补技术不足的组织形式。 作为技术使用文化时期(或文化统治技术时期)到技术统治文化时期的过渡阶段,巴洛克时期的城市有着自己独有的特性,在城市观上冲破了文化的统治,表现为一种多样性与统一的矛盾美；在权力结构上,城市的中央集权达到了顶峰并预示着一种权力的分散；在城市功能与形式上,先古的形式混乱了,功能逐渐被搁置于最后考虑。在这样 -种矛盾的城市观下,随着文化内部的矛盾的激化、技术的进步,巴洛克主义城市观逐渐被新的文化、技术下的经济体制解构了。 在文化的惯性作用下,现代城市观表现为巴洛克主义城市观专制君主概念的民主化,机械的规划方式的经济化和建筑技术的垄断化,先古的典范在技术进步和文化代偿作用的减弱下逐渐被解构。并且随着人们对技术的依赖,技术的方法完全变成城市发展的主要手段,郊区形成了特大城市,表现为一种“看不见的城市”。同时随着文化作用的淡化,城市异质性和城市生态问题日渐严重。 基于技术与文化的历史分析,在城市与技术、文化的一般规律上表现在四个方面。首先在技术、文化对城市发展的主导作用,表现为一种世界观的指引和技术的基础作用；其次在城市对技术、文化的作用方面,表现为“磁体容器”功能,城市形成了一种矛盾的综合体；再次,在技术与文化对城市的影响路径方面表现为：技术主导——文化主导——技术主导,它预示着“技术”的观念在城市社会中的渗透过程；最后城市发展的动力是技术与文化的不平衡性,这种不平衡性产生了最基本的技术与文化的矛盾,更为具体的表现在城市观与人们需求层次的矛盾。
[Abstract]:Urban problems have been puzzling people from the beginning to now. The theoretical circle has also been exploring ways to solve urban problems. The study of urban problems is mostly from the aspects of politics and economy, anthropology, historical philosophy, cultural philosophy, etc. But rarely from the point of view of technology and culture. In this way, there is a lack of fundamental understanding of the direction of urban development. This paper, from a technical and cultural perspective, from the perspective of special to general, from the time axis of the city, the function of the city, the activity of the city, and so on. This paper tries to reveal the guiding track and law of urban development. The production of cities depends on the storage technology, building technology, domestication of animals and plants and water conservancy technology, which laid a material foundation for the development of the city. But the technological foundation is still insufficient to the city development, needs the cultural compensation to make up, and this kind of compensation has produced the city. There is a kind of "pre-ancient form" leading to the emergence of the city, and this "pre-ancient form" formed a model of urban development in the period of cultural domination. The essence of the city is to inherit this organizational form of compensation to compensate for the lack of technology. As the transitional stage from the period of technology using culture (or the period of culture ruling technology) to the period of technology ruling culture, the city of Baroque had its own unique characteristics and broke through the rule of culture in the view of city. It is manifested in the contradictory beauty of diversity and unity; In the structure of power, the centralization of city power has reached its peak and indicates a decentralization of power; in the function and form of the city, the old form is confused, and the function is gradually shelved in the final consideration. With the intensification of the contradiction within culture and the progress of technology, Baroque view of the city is gradually deconstructed by the new culture and the economic system under technology. Under the influence of culture inertia, the modern city view is manifested by the democratization of the concept of the despotic monarch, the economic of mechanical planning and the monopoly of construction technology. The pre-ancient paradigm was gradually deconstructed under the weakening of technological progress and cultural compensation. Along with people's dependence on technology, the method of technology has become the main means of urban development, and the suburb has formed a megalopolis, which is shown as an "invisible city". At the same time, with the desalination of cultural role, urban heterogeneity and urban ecological problems are becoming more and more serious. Based on the historical analysis of technology and culture, the general law of city and technology, culture is manifested in four aspects. Firstly, the dominant role of technology and culture to the development of cities is the guidance of a kind of world outlook and the basic function of technology. Secondly, in the function of city to technology and culture, the function of "magnet container" is represented, and the city forms a kind of contradictory synthesis. Thirdly, the influence path of technology and culture on the city is shown as follows: technology leading-culture leading-technology leading, which indicates the infiltration process of the concept of technology in urban society; Finally, the motive force of urban development is the imbalance between technology and culture, which leads to the most basic contradiction between technology and culture, which is more concretely manifested in the contradiction between the view of city and the level of people's needs.
【学位授予单位】：长沙理工大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：C912.81
本文编号：2377413
[Abstract]:Urban problems have been puzzling people from the beginning to now. The theoretical circle has also been exploring ways to solve urban problems. The study of urban problems is mostly from the aspects of politics and economy, anthropology, historical philosophy, cultural philosophy, etc. But rarely from the point of view of technology and culture. In this way, there is a lack of fundamental understanding of the direction of urban development. This paper, from a technical and cultural perspective, from the perspective of special to general, from the time axis of the city, the function of the city, the activity of the city, and so on. This paper tries to reveal the guiding track and law of urban development. The production of cities depends on the storage technology, building technology, domestication of animals and plants and water conservancy technology, which laid a material foundation for the development of the city. But the technological foundation is still insufficient to the city development, needs the cultural compensation to make up, and this kind of compensation has produced the city. There is a kind of "pre-ancient form" leading to the emergence of the city, and this "pre-ancient form" formed a model of urban development in the period of cultural domination. The essence of the city is to inherit this organizational form of compensation to compensate for the lack of technology. As the transitional stage from the period of technology using culture (or the period of culture ruling technology) to the period of technology ruling culture, the city of Baroque had its own unique characteristics and broke through the rule of culture in the view of city. It is manifested in the contradictory beauty of diversity and unity; In the structure of power, the centralization of city power has reached its peak and indicates a decentralization of power; in the function and form of the city, the old form is confused, and the function is gradually shelved in the final consideration. With the intensification of the contradiction within culture and the progress of technology, Baroque view of the city is gradually deconstructed by the new culture and the economic system under technology. Under the influence of culture inertia, the modern city view is manifested by the democratization of the concept of the despotic monarch, the economic of mechanical planning and the monopoly of construction technology. The pre-ancient paradigm was gradually deconstructed under the weakening of technological progress and cultural compensation. Along with people's dependence on technology, the method of technology has become the main means of urban development, and the suburb has formed a megalopolis, which is shown as an "invisible city". At the same time, with the desalination of cultural role, urban heterogeneity and urban ecological problems are becoming more and more serious. Based on the historical analysis of technology and culture, the general law of city and technology, culture is manifested in four aspects. Firstly, the dominant role of technology and culture to the development of cities is the guidance of a kind of world outlook and the basic function of technology. Secondly, in the function of city to technology and culture, the function of "magnet container" is represented, and the city forms a kind of contradictory synthesis. Thirdly, the influence path of technology and culture on the city is shown as follows: technology leading-culture leading-technology leading, which indicates the infiltration process of the concept of technology in urban society; Finally, the motive force of urban development is the imbalance between technology and culture, which leads to the most basic contradiction between technology and culture, which is more concretely manifested in the contradiction between the view of city and the level of people's needs.
【学位授予单位】：长沙理工大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：C912.81
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 罗玉成,罗万里;论制度文化与精神文化的关系[J];船山学刊;2003年04期
2 吴庆洲;象天法地意匠与中国古都规划[J];华中建筑;1996年02期
3 李佳;莫畏;;“新京”城市规划中的巴洛克影响[J];吉林建筑工程学院学报;2009年04期
4 蒋显荣;;人是否是世界的主体?——生态文明意识中值得探讨的一个问题[J];理论界;2009年02期
5 田中英道,赵权利;巴洛克与东方[J];美术观察;2000年10期
6 滕海键;;论近代早期英国农业革命在工业革命中的地位——兼评保罗·贝罗奇的农业革命先行论[J];内蒙古民族大学学报(社会科学版);2006年04期
7 张品;;新韦伯主义城市空间研究述评[J];理论与现代化;2011年03期
8 马珂;;巴洛克与当代中国城市规划[J];商场现代化;2010年32期
9 马世骏,王如松;社会-经济-自然复合生态系统[J];生态学报;1984年01期
10 李嘉;;关于巴洛克概念的解读[J];沈阳师范大学学报(社会科学版);2007年04期
，本文编号：2377413
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/shgj/2377413.html
