古典进化论与“地域组织标志说”的终结
发布时间：2019-01-01 08:27
【摘要】：作为摩尔根古代社会理论的重要组成部分,"地域组织标志说"对19世纪后半期以来人类学、历史学领域的相关研究产生了深远影响。然而从20世纪初开始,大量人类学材料和历史学研究成果的涌现对"地域组织标志说"的科学性和解释力提出严峻挑战,使得这一学说在事实上已经处于终结状态。从学科理论与方法论角度看,"地域组织标志说"之所以未能经得起时间的检验,与古典进化论的"文化平行说""单线进化说"以及简单化的"比较研究法"直接相关。有些中国学者之所以不愿意接受"地域组织标志说"已经终结的事实,是因为他们过高估计了进化论在解释人类历史方面的价值,并且未能在古典进化论与马克思主义理论之间做出必要的区分。
[Abstract]:As an important part of Morgen's ancient social theory, the theory of regional organization mark has had a profound influence on the research of anthropology and history since the second half of the 19th century. However, since the beginning of the 20th century, the emergence of a large number of anthropological materials and historical research results has posed a severe challenge to the scientific nature and explanatory power of the "regional organization mark theory", which has made the theory in fact in the end. From the point of view of discipline theory and methodology, the reason why "regional organization mark theory" can not stand the test of time is directly related to the "cultural parallel theory" and "single-line evolution theory" of classical evolution theory and the simplified "comparative research method". Some Chinese scholars are reluctant to accept the fact that the "geographical organization mark" is over because they overestimate the value of evolution in interpreting human history. And failed to make the necessary distinction between classical evolution and Marxist theory.
【作者单位】： 中国社会科学杂志社;
【分类号】：C912.4
本文编号：2397277
[Abstract]:As an important part of Morgen's ancient social theory, the theory of regional organization mark has had a profound influence on the research of anthropology and history since the second half of the 19th century. However, since the beginning of the 20th century, the emergence of a large number of anthropological materials and historical research results has posed a severe challenge to the scientific nature and explanatory power of the "regional organization mark theory", which has made the theory in fact in the end. From the point of view of discipline theory and methodology, the reason why "regional organization mark theory" can not stand the test of time is directly related to the "cultural parallel theory" and "single-line evolution theory" of classical evolution theory and the simplified "comparative research method". Some Chinese scholars are reluctant to accept the fact that the "geographical organization mark" is over because they overestimate the value of evolution in interpreting human history. And failed to make the necessary distinction between classical evolution and Marxist theory.
【作者单位】： 中国社会科学杂志社;
【分类号】：C912.4
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前6条
1 郝孚逸;;由“狼图腾”的争议想起摩尔根的《古代社会》[J];湖北社会科学;2005年12期
2 李永伟;;一种氏族民主制与两种人类文明——路易斯·亨利·摩尔根《古代社会》读后存疑[J];新余高专学报;2009年01期
3 袁长庚;张海洋;;阐旧邦以辅新命——重读L·H·摩尔根的《古代社会》[J];湖北民族学院学报(哲学社会科学版);2008年03期
4 徐国栋;;家庭、国家和方法论:现代学者对摩尔根、恩格斯——对《古代社会》、《家庭、私有制和国家的起源》之批评百年综述[J];法律文化研究;2006年00期
5 Ю·П·阿维尔基耶娃;李毅夫;;现代民族学源流(为纪念摩尔根《古代社会》发表一百周年而作)[J];民族译丛;1979年02期
6 D·查托帕德雅雅;魏治臻;;《古代社会》导论(下)[J];民族译丛;1987年03期
，本文编号：2397277
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/shgj/2397277.html
