生活质量测量领域的金三角
发布时间：2019-01-03 06:27
【摘要】：生活质量存在于两个相互独立的领域,一个是客观性领域,很多人都基本可以证实同一结果,另一个是主观性领域,由不同个体体验的情感组成。本文关注主观性领域、主观福祉动态平衡理论和测量问题。经验性检测需要依靠有效可信的数据,人们使用最多的测量手段是以领域为单位、依两个重要原则建构的。一是不论残障与否,测量工具适用于所有人,确保判断生活质量的标准普遍适用。二是测量工具应力求简约,因为潜在领域数量可能极其可观,所以人们在决定领域取舍时应严格使用标准。个人福祉指数就符合上述原则。个人福祉指数的建构源自"对生活总体满意"初级层次的拆解。金钱、人际关系和成就感所形成的"金三角"体现出残障者和非残障者获得资源支持的关键。因此,为了有助于将主观福祉维持在正常水准,我们需要针对上述三个领域提供服务。
[Abstract]:The quality of life exists in two independent fields, one is the objective field, many people can basically prove the same result, the other is the subjective field, which is composed of different emotions of individual experience. This paper focuses on subjective field, dynamic balance theory and measurement of subjective well-being. Empirical testing depends on effective and reliable data. The most commonly used measurement methods are based on two important principles. The first is that measuring tools apply to all people, regardless of disability, to ensure that quality of life standards are universally applicable. Second, the measurement tools should be minimalist, because the number of potential fields may be extremely substantial, so people should strictly use the criteria in deciding the choice of the field. The personal Well-being Index is in line with the above principles. The construction of personal well-being index originates from the disassembly of the primary level of overall satisfaction with life. The golden triangle of money, relationships, and a sense of achievement reflects the key to resource support for the disabled and the non-disabled. Therefore, in order to help maintain subjective well-being at normal levels, we need to provide services in these three areas.
【作者单位】： 澳大利亚迪肯大学;悉尼大学医学院残障研究中心;
【分类号】：C913.69
，
本文编号：2399008
[Abstract]:The quality of life exists in two independent fields, one is the objective field, many people can basically prove the same result, the other is the subjective field, which is composed of different emotions of individual experience. This paper focuses on subjective field, dynamic balance theory and measurement of subjective well-being. Empirical testing depends on effective and reliable data. The most commonly used measurement methods are based on two important principles. The first is that measuring tools apply to all people, regardless of disability, to ensure that quality of life standards are universally applicable. Second, the measurement tools should be minimalist, because the number of potential fields may be extremely substantial, so people should strictly use the criteria in deciding the choice of the field. The personal Well-being Index is in line with the above principles. The construction of personal well-being index originates from the disassembly of the primary level of overall satisfaction with life. The golden triangle of money, relationships, and a sense of achievement reflects the key to resource support for the disabled and the non-disabled. Therefore, in order to help maintain subjective well-being at normal levels, we need to provide services in these three areas.
【作者单位】： 澳大利亚迪肯大学;悉尼大学医学院残障研究中心;
【分类号】：C913.69
，
本文编号：2399008
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/shgj/2399008.html
