大国协调与跨区域安全治理

发布时间：2018-02-28 06:56

本文关键词： 跨区域大国协调安全治理联合国安理会效果评估　出处：《国际安全研究》2014年01期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：大国协调作为一种重要的多边安全机制,从成员的来源和所涉及的核心层次看,大国协调可分为区域、跨区域和全球三种形态。冷战后,由于体系层次和单元层次发生了重大改变,大国协调在区域安全治理中兴起。跨区域大国协调在新的历史条件下遵循了协调机制的一般规范与规则:一致性、合法性、责任性、包容性和自我克制。同时,它也具有突出的时代特点和独特功能:一是大国协调的会议成果被联合国安理会所认可、接受,与集体安全机制出现了紧密融合的新趋势;二是区域组织加入到大国协调的会议进程中来,发挥建设性作用,如柬埔寨问题解决中的东盟和伊朗核问题大国会谈中的欧盟。跨区域大国协调以大国为主导,具有鲜明的多边特性,对冷战后的国际安全治理体系、区域安全以及美国的唯一超级大国地位都产生了深刻影响。中国作为新兴大国,尤应重视跨区域大国协调的作用,因为它既为区域层次上的东亚安全合作,也为突破历史困境,实现"崛起国"和"守成国"在国际体系内和平共存、共同为国际社会供给公共产品,提供了可以借鉴的路径选择。
[Abstract]:As an important multilateral security mechanism, from the source of membership and the core level involved, great power coordination can be divided into three forms: regional, cross-regional and global. As a result of the significant changes in the system and unit levels, the coordination of the great powers has risen in the governance of regional security. Under the new historical conditions, the coordination of cross-regional powers has followed the general norms and rules of the coordination mechanism: consistency, legitimacy, responsibility, etc. Inclusiveness and self-restraint. At the same time, it also has outstanding characteristics of the times and unique functions: first, the outcome of the conference coordinated by the great powers was recognized by the UN Security Council, accepted, and closely integrated with the collective security mechanism. Second, regional organizations have joined the process of major power coordination meetings and played a constructive role. For example, in the talks between ASEAN and Iran on the nuclear issue in the context of the settlement of the Cambodian issue, the European Union. Cross-regional coordination among major powers is dominated by major powers. With its distinctive multilateral character, it has had a profound impact on the system of international security governance after the cold war, regional security and the status of the United States as the sole superpower. Because it is not only for the security cooperation in East Asia at the regional level, but also for breaking through the historical dilemma, to realize the peaceful coexistence of "rising nations" and "conservative states" within the international system, and to jointly supply public goods to the international community. It provides the path choice that can be used for reference.
【作者单位】：中国现代国际关系研究院非洲研究所;南京大学国际关系研究院;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目“区域间合作与全球治理”(批准号:10YJAGJW025)的研究成果韩国高等教育财团“国际学术交流项目(ISEF)” “南京大学人文基金”资助
【分类号】：D815.5

【参考文献】