中欧对非援助—在分歧中寻求合作

发布时间：2018-03-26 02:58

本文选题：中国　切入点：欧盟　出处：《复旦大学》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：对外援助是国际政治和经济中的一个重要的领域,是国家或者国际组织内部政治经济的外延,是其维护政治经济利益,实现战略目标,树立道德形象的重要平台。中国作为最大的发展中国家,始终把加强同非洲国家在内的发展中国家的友好合作作为外交政策的基石,对非援助是中国对外关系的一个重要方面。欧盟是国际上最大的对外援助集团,其借助历史惯性,通过对非援助延续并扩大在政治,经济等领域对非洲国家的影响。对非援助问题是中欧关系中的一个新的重要领域,中欧在对非援助问题上的发展趋势对解决非洲的稳定与发展、实现联合国千年发展目标以及中欧全面战略性伙伴关系有着重大的影响。本文以对外援助为视角,对中欧双方在对非援助问题上的分歧和合作进行了分析。着重分析了中欧双方在对非援助问题上开展合作的动因和障碍,并对今后中欧双方在对非援助合作提出了具体的建议。本文首先以对外援助作为切入点,分别针对中国和欧盟对非援助的援助以及各自模式做了历史梳理和简单比较。中欧双方援助非洲都经历了不同的阶段,分析了双方对非援助政策的起始,调整和发展阶段,并比较了双方在不同援助非洲政策指导下的对非援助的共性与分歧。其次,分析了中欧双方在对非援助的空间及局限。认为虽然中国和欧盟双方不太相同的援助模式,但是中欧双方在对非援助上能够开展合作主要得益于中欧双方在对非援助问题上具有共同利益和互补利益,并且受到了全球性问题的挑战和合作观念认同的推动以及实现中欧全面战略伙伴关系的需要。再次,本文以中欧双方在苏丹达尔富尔问题和刚果金冲突的分歧与合作为例阐述了中欧双方在该问题认识上的分歧,以及为非洲提供人道主义援助等合作的实践。最后,从中欧双方对非洲援助的合作现状来看,双方存在着巨大的合作潜力,中国和欧盟在对非援助上不是“零和博弈”。虽然援非的“中国模式”和“欧盟模式”存在分歧,但是双方在非洲也存在广泛的利益交汇点,在援非问题上,双方应该超越彼此的分歧,建立一种更为开放的、合作的、共赢的方式达成利益的共享而不是冲突的持续,争取在推动非洲发展进程中实现各方利益的共赢。
[Abstract]:Foreign aid is an important field in international politics and economy, the extension of politics and economy within a country or an international organization, and the maintenance of political and economic interests and the realization of a strategic goal. As the largest developing country, China has always taken the strengthening of friendly cooperation with developing countries, including African countries, as the cornerstone of its foreign policy. Aid to Africa is an important aspect of China's foreign relations. The EU is the largest foreign aid group in the world. The impact of economic and other fields on African countries. The issue of aid to Africa is a new and important area in China-EU relations. The development trend of China and the EU on the issue of aid to Africa will solve the problem of stability and development in Africa. The achievement of the Millennium Development goals of the United Nations and the comprehensive strategic partnership between China and the EU have a significant impact. This paper analyzes the differences and cooperation between the two sides on the issue of aid to Africa, and emphatically analyzes the motives and obstacles of the cooperation between the two sides on the issue of aid to Africa, and puts forward concrete suggestions for the future cooperation between the two sides in the field of aid to Africa. In this paper, first of all, with foreign aid as the starting point, the history of China and the European Union's aid to Africa and their respective models are reviewed and compared. Both China and Europe have experienced different stages of aid to Africa. This paper analyzes the initiation, adjustment and development stages of bilateral aid policies to Africa, and compares the similarities and differences between the two sides under the guidance of different aid policies for Africa. Secondly, This paper analyzes the space and limitation of China-EU aid to Africa. Although China and the EU do not share the same aid model, However, the cooperation between China and the EU in aid to Africa is mainly due to the common interests and complementary interests of the two sides on the issue of aid to Africa. And has been driven by the challenges of global issues and the recognition of the concept of cooperation, as well as the need to realize the comprehensive strategic partnership between China and the EU. Again, Taking the differences and cooperation between the two sides on the Darfur issue in the Sudan and the DRC conflict as an example, this paper expounds the differences in the understanding of this issue between the two sides, as well as the practice of cooperation in providing humanitarian assistance to Africa. Finally, Judging from the current situation of China-EU cooperation in aid to Africa, there is enormous potential for cooperation between the two sides. China and the EU are not "zero-sum game" in aid to Africa. Although there are differences between the "China model" and "EU model" in aid to Africa, But there is also a broad convergence of interests between the two sides in Africa. On the issue of aid to Africa, the two sides should transcend their differences and establish a more open, cooperative and win-win way to achieve benefit-sharing rather than the continuation of the conflict. We will strive to achieve win-win results for all parties in the process of promoting the development of Africa.
【学位授予单位】：复旦大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D822.34;D85

【参考文献】