驳“钓鱼岛之名源于一山一宁的驻留”

发布时间：2018-04-24 18:27

本文选题：钓鱼岛 + 一山一宁　；参考：《学术界》2015年04期

【摘要】：《郑和研究》2013年第2期《钓鱼岛史料三则·钓鱼岛之名源于一山一宁的驻留》,述及钓鱼岛早在元代,已被日本人包括元入日本国籍僧日本国师一山一宁等,乘日本民间商船"潜逃回越州(今浙江绍兴)"途中,发现、驻留、利用、得名。以此实例所证实的乃是"钓鱼岛历史的真实名称及主权归属于日本"。这是对《钓鱼岛是中国的固有领土》白皮书,所述中国首先发现、命名、利用、管辖钓鱼岛的否定。经核查,该文举出为据的三种日本著作,无一有此记载。经考析,一山一宁在1299-1317年间,一直驻留并逝世于日本;其遁越州,乃是去日本福井,而非中国绍兴。该文对相关的历史认知错误,无中生有,以致反为"钓鱼岛是日本的固有领土"提供了伪证,应予批驳,消除其负面影响。钓鱼列岛问题的研究与评介,必须实事求是,不得妄言。
[Abstract]:The second issue of 2013 "the name of the three Diaoyu Islands derived from the presence of Yishan Yining", which covers the Diaoyu Islands as early as the Yuan Dynasty, has been included by the Japanese, including the Japanese monk, the Japanese national monk, Yishan Yining, and so on. Japanese folk merchant ships "absconding back to Yuezhou (now Shaoxing, Zhejiang)" on the way, found, stay, use, named. This example confirms that the true name and sovereignty of the Diaoyu Islands belong to Japan. This is the white paper "Diaoyu Islands is an inherent territory of China", which states that China first discovered, named, used, and administered the Diaoyu Islands. Upon verification, none of the three Japanese works cited in this paper have been recorded in this paper. Yishan Yining, who lived and died in Japan between 1299 and 1317, went to Fukui, Japan, not Shaoxing, China. This paper gives false testimony to the fact that the Diaoyu Island is an inherent territory of Japan and should be refuted and its negative effects eliminated. The research and evaluation of fishing islands must be realistic and not be said in vain.
【作者单位】：南京晓庄学院生命科学系;
【分类号】：D815.3

【相似文献】