冷战结束后中国在东亚的身份分析

发布时间：2018-04-27 02:08

本文选题：身份 + 东亚　；参考：《山东大学》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：中国经历了经济的迅速发展,在国际政治中的地位也日渐提高。然而伴随着种种可喜成就出现的是目前中国对自身的身份认知缺失的问题。换言之,由于目前中国经历了其在国际政治中的地位的变换,对于“我们是谁?”这样的问题认识的并不是特别的清楚,所以国内外才会出现对于中国的战略、立场和意图等问题的争论。毋庸置疑,冷战期间“身份”对于世界上的绝大多数国家都不是一个难于回答的问题,尤其是对中国来说,这并不成为令人困扰的问题。但是冷战结束之后,苏联解体,随着国际政治风云际会的变化,这逐渐成为一个棘手的问题。本文的主要目的就是要回答在东亚地区社会中,中国是以一个什么样的身份而存在着这个简单的问题。主要方法是从建构主义对身份的分析入手来解决中国作为一个“自我”在东亚地区的身份应该如何界定的问题。本文在分析温特的温和建构主义对“身份”这一概念的诠释,以及其他相关的理论流派对这一概念内涵理解的基础上,首先分析了身份形成的理论。由于温特在其《国际政治的社会理论》中提出了身份形成的两种逻辑,即自然选择和文化选择。那么以此为基础,假设对国家身份形成的影响因素主要有：自我持有的观念、他者持有的观念。其中,这两个方面又可以分别从物质因素(自然选择)和文化因素(文化选择)两方面考虑。这就是本文所提出自身的理论框架。通过这一理论框架,对冷战结束至今的这段时间内中国在东亚的身份进行分析。也就是根据本文所假设的分析框架,分析冷战结束后中国在东亚地区的身份主要是从中国自我持有的观念和东亚的“他者”所持有的观念两个角度入手。而对着两个问题的分析又是一个十分难于操作的问题。例如：如何去衡量和分析中国自我持有的观念,或者说中国的自我认同?同样我们可以把这个问题普遍化,那就变成了如何去分析一个国家的自我认同?文章中提出了从物质因素和文化因素两方面去展开分析。另外,对他者持有的观念的衡量也存在着同样的问题。下文将紧密依据文章理论假设的框架进行。如何去验证本文根据自己的假设和理论框架所得出的结论也同样是一个十分关键的问题。本文选取的角度是通过分析中国的对外政策来验证前文中对中国身份的定论是否正确。那么中国对外政策的分析又通过哪些渠道来解决呢?本文的最后部分将一一论述这些问题。
[Abstract]:China has experienced rapid economic development, and its position in international politics is increasing. However, with all kinds of gratifying achievements, there is a lack of identity cognition in China. In other words, because China has now gone through a change in its position in international politics, to "who are we?" Such issues are not particularly clear, so domestic and foreign disputes over China's strategy, position and intentions. There is no doubt that "identity" during the Cold War was not a difficult question for most countries in the world, especially for China. But after the end of the Cold War, the Soviet Union disintegrated, as the international political landscape changed, this gradually became a thorny problem. The main purpose of this paper is to answer the simple question of what kind of identity China is in East Asian society. The main method is to solve the problem of how to define China's identity as a "self" in East Asia from the analysis of constructivism. Based on the analysis of the interpretation of the concept of "identity" by Winter's moderate constructivism and the understanding of the connotation of the concept by other relevant schools of theory, this paper first analyzes the theory of identity formation. Because in his Social Theory of International Politics, Winter put forward two kinds of logic of identity formation, that is, natural selection and cultural selection. On the basis of this assumption, the main factors that influence the formation of national identity are: the concept of self-possession and the concept of others. These two aspects can be considered from two aspects: material factor (natural selection) and cultural factor (cultural choice). This is the theoretical framework proposed in this paper. Through this theoretical framework, this paper analyzes the status of China in East Asia during the period from the end of the Cold War to the end of the Cold War. That is to say, according to the hypothetical analytical framework of this paper, the analysis of China's identity in East Asia after the end of the Cold War is mainly from two angles: China's concept of self-possession and the concept of "other" in East Asia. The analysis of two problems is a very difficult problem to operate. For example: how to measure and analyze China's concept of self-holding, or China's self-identity? We can also generalize this question, and that becomes how to analyze a nation's self-identity. This paper puts forward the analysis from two aspects: material factor and cultural factor. In addition, there is a similar problem in the measurement of the other's ideas. The following is closely based on the framework of the theoretical assumptions of the article. How to verify the conclusions of this paper based on its own hypothesis and theoretical framework is also a key issue. This paper analyzes China's foreign policy to verify whether the conclusion of China's identity is correct. So, through what channels is the analysis of China's foreign policy solved? The last part of this paper will deal with these problems one by one.
【学位授予单位】：山东大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D820

【参考文献】