对话与对抗:媒体外交视野下的“南海仲裁案”

发布时间：2018-05-19 22:29

本文选题：媒体外交 + “南海仲裁案”　；参考：《太平洋学报》2017年04期

【摘要】：自2016年7月12日海牙仲裁庭公布关于菲律宾提起的"南海仲裁案"的实体问题裁决以来,有关该仲裁案的相关报道吸引了世人的眼球。事实上,自2013年菲律宾阿基诺三世政府单方面向海牙仲裁庭提起仲裁以来,"南海问题"一直是国际舆论关注的焦点。本文从媒体外交视角分析了中国和菲律宾主要英文媒体《中国日报》和《菲律宾每日询问者报》对"南海仲裁案"的报道,通过框架分析发现,"双边协商"与"多边外交"之争,"不合法"与"约束力"之争归根结底可以纳入"新兴大国"与"守成大国"之争的范畴。而隐藏在媒体框架背后的是中菲两国在"南海问题"上的"对话"与"对抗"两种截然不同的态度。
[Abstract]:Since the arbitration tribunal of Hague announced the substantive issue of the "South China Sea arbitration case" issued by the Philippines arbitration tribunal in July 12, 2016, the relevant reports on the case have attracted the attention of the world. In fact, since the Philippines Aquino III government unilaterally submitted arbitration to the Hague arbitration tribunal in 2013, the "South China Sea issue" has been an international public opinion. From the perspective of media diplomacy, this paper analyzes the reports of China Daily and Philippines's main English media, China Daily and Philippines Daily Inquirer, on the South China Sea arbitration case. Through the framework analysis, it is found that the dispute between "bilateral consultation" and "multilateral diplomacy", "disagreement" and "binding" can be included in the final analysis of the "emerging power" and "new power". Behind the media framework, there are two different dialogues between China and Philippines in the "South China Sea issue", namely, "dialogue" and "confrontation".
【作者单位】：中国传媒大学;
【基金】：2015年国家社科基金重点项目“习近平总书记的大国传播与公共外交思想研究”(15AXW005)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D823;G206

【相似文献】