中美“伙伴关系”外交的比较研究
发布时间:2018-06-05 00:37
本文选题:伙伴关系 + 中美外交 ; 参考:《外交学院》2012年博士论文
【摘要】:本论文主要就中美“伙伴关系”外交进行了比较研究。首先从国际格局、地区和全球战略稳定以及国家间关系中的“伙伴关系”三个角度,对“伙伴关系”的理论内涵进行了分析和梳理。“伙伴关系”是指国际关系行为体间为寻求共同利益而建立的一种合作关系。在“协调型”的国际格局下国家之间一般不存在针对性的“伙伴关系”。战略稳定不再局限于军事层面,而拓展至政治、经济和文化等领域,它与地缘政治的关系是十分密切的,“地缘重心国”决定着未来国际体系的稳定与发展。“伙伴关系”外交共分为三类,以“结盟”为特征的“联盟型伙伴关系”、以“不结盟”为原则的“普遍型伙伴关系”、以“制衡对手”为目的的“对手式伙伴关系”。决定“伙伴关系”的变量主要有三种,即自变量、因变量和干预变量。自变量主要有国际体系、国际格局,,国家性质、利益和实力等;因变量分别是国际形势、国家关系的紧密度等;干预变量则是领导人态度、突发事件及第三方国的变化等。在厘清“伙伴关系”理论内涵的基础上,建立了一般性“伙伴关系”外交理论分析框架。在学理上,“伙伴关系”又可以分为“积极伙伴关系”、“相对积极伙伴关系”、“相对消极伙伴关系”和“消极伙伴关系”。据此,本论文对中美两国“伙伴关系”的发展状况进行了梳理与比较研究,努力揭示出中美双方的特征,构建了两国“伙伴关系”外交的分析模型,包括影响因素、体系构成和功能效应等模型。中美双方“伙伴关系”外交的主要差异分别表现在“无针对性”与“有针对性”、“无敌国”与“有敌国”、“聚和型”与“扩张型”、“普遍型为主”与“联盟型为主”等。本论文还从战略学的角度对中美两国“伙伴关系”的相互认知差异以及中美两国对双边“伙伴关系”的认知差异进行了深入的分析。
[Abstract]:This thesis makes a comparative study on the relationship between China and the United States. Firstly, from three angles of international pattern, regional and global strategic stability and "partnership" in inter-state relations, the theoretical connotation of "partnership" is analyzed and sorted out. "Partnership" refers to a cooperative relationship between international relations actors in pursuit of common interests. In the "coordinated" international pattern, there is generally no targeted "partnership" between countries. Strategic stability is no longer confined to military level, but extends to political, economic and cultural fields. Its relationship with geopolitics is very close. The "geopolitical center of gravity" determines the stability and development of the future international system. "Partnership" diplomacy is divided into three categories: "alliance partnership" characterized by "alliance", "universal partnership" based on "non-alignment" principle, and "rival partnership" with the aim of "counterbalancing adversary". There are three kinds of variables that determine partnership: independent variable, dependent variable and intervention variable. Independent variables are mainly international system, international pattern, national nature, interests and strength; dependent variables are the international situation and the closeness of state relations; intervention variables are the attitude of leaders, unexpected events and changes in third countries. On the basis of clarifying the connotation of "partnership" theory, this paper establishes a general "partnership" diplomatic theoretical analysis framework. In theory, "partnership" can be divided into "positive partnership", "relative negative partnership" and "negative partnership". On the basis of this, this paper makes a comparative study on the development of the "partnership" between China and the United States, tries to reveal the characteristics of the two countries, and constructs an analytical model of the "partnership" diplomacy between the two countries, including the influencing factors. System structure and functional effects. The main differences of the "partnership" diplomacy between China and the United States are shown in "untargeted" and "targeted", "invincible country" and "enemy state", "convergence type" and "expansion type", "universal type" and "alliance type mainly" and so on. From the perspective of strategy, this paper also makes a deep analysis of the cognitive differences between China and the United States on the "partnership" between China and the United States, as well as the cognitive differences between the two countries on the bilateral "partnership".
【学位授予单位】:外交学院
【学位级别】:博士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:D822.371.2
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前6条
1 王贵锋,胡吉良;论江泽民的伙伴外交战略[J];社会主义研究;2005年03期
2 门洪华;中国外交哲学的演变[J];教学与研究;2005年04期
3 宁骚;选择伙伴战略 营造伙伴关系──跨入21世纪的中国外交[J];新视野;2000年02期
4 潘振强;关于重建全球战略稳定的理论思考[J];国际问题研究;2002年04期
5 金正昆;伙伴战略:中国外交的理性抉择[J];教学与研究;2000年07期
6 苏浩;地缘重心与世界政治的支点[J];现代国际关系;2004年04期
本文编号:1979598
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/waijiao/1979598.html