论全球治理的困境与出路
发布时间:2018-06-20 11:31
本文选题:全球化 + 全球治理 ; 参考:《山东大学》2013年硕士论文
【摘要】:二十世纪九十年代的全球化给世界带来了繁荣、发展,促进了各国在世界范围的交流,更多的优秀技术和经验被传播到世界各地,可以说,全球化为世界带来了前所未有的大繁荣大发展;但是,在以发展为主题的历史洪流背景下,我们也必须清醒地认识到全球化并不是单纯美好的事物,它也给我们带来了各方面的问题,而这些问题伴随着全球化带来的巨大便利迅速地传播到其他国家,具有全球性的特征,这些全球问题主要涉及到政治、经济、生态、人权等问题。这就导致单凭一国之力难以全盘掌控这些负面影响,必须结合他国力量,在成熟的、有秩序的国际规则和共同的价值理念下共同致力于全球问题的解决。 在近二十年的全球治理的进程中,世界各国家、各国际组织甚至全球公民社会等治理主体和全球公共危机、环境以及其他方面的治理等治理对象方面面临一些困境,在一定程度上阻碍了全球治理的前进脚步。造成困境的原因是多方面的,但是究其根源主要是国际机制的不健全、治理主体地位间的不平等以及在治理过程中存在的价值冲突。这些问题在全球治理的顺利进行过程中,起着举足轻重的作用。很显然,如何解决这些困境就成为现阶段全球治理进程中的首要任务。 前面提到,解决全球问题并不能单靠一国力量,但有一些问题确实需要单个国家特别是大国发挥作用。因此,解决路径就分为两条路来进行:一方面以国际视角为中心进行治理,主要是在合作、价值观以及法律法规的建设等方面进行努力;另一方面是以中国这个发展中大国的视角来考虑。具有中国特色的和谐世界理念可以应用到对世界问题的解决中来。要明确中国在全球治理中的责任和义务,并且要认识到中国参与全球治理的制约因素,这样才能更准确更有效地参与全球治理。 全球治理是一项长期的任务,它关乎到整个世界的发展,世界各国都应参与到这个过程中来。全球治理的主体应当明确治理的目的,摒弃不必要和不正确的观念,真正致力于整个世界的繁荣和发展中来。全球治理的客体方面,应以国家和世界的角度来全面考虑,既能从宏观上符合世界发展的大趋势又能满足微观上国家发展的需要。总之,全球治理是一个长期而艰巨的过程,需要各国的参与,共同促进世界的和平稳定发展。
[Abstract]:Globalization in the 1990s has brought prosperity and development to the world, promoted the exchange of countries around the world, and spread more excellent technologies and experiences around the world. Globalization has brought unprecedented prosperity and development to the world; however, in the context of the historical torrent of development, we must also be aware that globalization is not simply a beautiful thing. It also brings us a wide range of problems that, along with the enormous conveniences of globalization, spread rapidly to other countries and have a global character, which are primarily political, economic, ecological, Human rights, etc. This makes it difficult for one country alone to control all these negative effects, and must combine the forces of other countries and work together to solve global problems under mature, orderly international rules and common values. In the process of global governance in the past two decades, countries, international organizations and even global civil society are facing some difficulties in governance such as global public crisis, environmental and other aspects of governance. To some extent, it hinders the progress of global governance. There are many reasons for the predicament, but the main causes are the imperfection of the international mechanism, the inequality between the governance subjects and the value conflict in the process of governance. These problems play an important role in the smooth progress of global governance. It is clear that how to resolve these dilemmas is the top priority in the current global governance process. As mentioned earlier, solving global problems cannot be done by one country alone, but there are some issues that do require the role of individual countries, especially big countries. Therefore, the solution path is divided into two ways: on the one hand, the international perspective of governance, mainly in cooperation, values and the construction of laws and regulations to carry out efforts; On the other hand, from the perspective of China as a developing country. The idea of a harmonious world with Chinese characteristics can be applied to the solution of world problems. It is necessary to clarify China's responsibilities and obligations in global governance and to recognize the constraints on China's participation in global governance in order to participate more accurately and effectively in global governance. Global governance is a long-term task, it is related to the development of the whole world, the world should participate in this process. The main body of global governance should make clear the purpose of governance, abandon unnecessary and incorrect ideas, and devote themselves to the prosperity and development of the whole world. The object of global governance should be considered comprehensively from the point of view of country and the world, which can not only meet the general trend of world development, but also meet the needs of national development in micro level. In short, global governance is a long-term and arduous process that requires the participation of all countries to jointly promote world peace, stability and development.
【学位授予单位】:山东大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:D80
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 徐双敏;罗重谱;;公共危机治理主体多元化的阻滞因素与实现策略[J];北京航空航天大学学报(社会科学版);2010年05期
2 邢爱芬;;实现和谐世界的国际法治途径[J];北京师范大学学报(社会科学版);2007年01期
3 吴嘉蓉;;论全球治理与我国行政管理体制改革[J];成都行政学院学报;2009年01期
4 陈心刚;;全球治理依托于人类秩序——访复旦大学国际关系与公共事务学院林尚立教授[J];理论参考;2007年05期
5 颜志强;;全球治理与中国责任之探析[J];重庆社会主义学院学报;2010年01期
6 李刚;;论戴维·赫尔德的全球治理思想[J];东北大学学报(社会科学版);2008年03期
7 陈绍锋,李永辉;全球治理及其限度[J];当代世界与社会主义;2001年06期
8 左高山;;和谐世界理念:一种新的政治伦理[J];道德与文明;2008年02期
9 易承志;;跨国公民社会参与全球治理的角色分析[J];东南学术;2011年02期
10 唐贤兴;全球治理:一个脆弱的概念[J];国际观察;1999年06期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 孙凤蕾;全球环境治理的主体问题研究[D];山东大学;2007年
,本文编号:2044111
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/waijiao/2044111.html