欧盟对滥用市场支配地位的法律规制研究

发布时间：2018-06-20 22:24

本文选题：欧盟竞争法 + 市场支配地位　；参考：《贵州民族大学》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：欧盟竞争法作为世界上最有影响力的竞争法体系之一，，已经有较为成熟的框架对滥用市场支配地位的行为进行规制，同时也给其他国家的相关立法提供了比较完善的欧洲模式，并对其关于滥用市场支配地位的反垄断立法产生了积极的影响。从立法目的来看，欧盟竞争法的首要目标是维护自由平等的竞争秩序及开放的市场经济环境，一个企业在市场上所占的地位决定着他的竞争能力和水平。在竞争市场上具有支配地位的企业占有明显的优势，如果不恰当地利用这种优势地位，可能会使市场力量遭到破坏。市场支配地位如何确定、对市场支配地位行为被滥用的合理规制，及如何防止私法制度被滥用来限制竞争等，无论是在竞争法立法还是司法实践上都是一个很重要的问题。因此，研究欧盟对滥用市场支配地位的法律规制不仅在理论上有必要性，而且对保护自由开放的市场和消费者权益，并为维护欧洲统一开放的大市场也具有十分重要的现实意义。本文主要分为三个部分，共三万多字。运用经济学分析、比较分析，实证分析及案例分析的方法，着重分析研究欧盟对滥用市场支配地位法律规制的立法与实践情况。第一部分主要阐述欧盟竞争法对滥用市场支配地位规制的立法规定。首先从历史发展的视角对欧盟竞争法的发展层次进行系统化的梳理，阐述了欧盟竞争法的各个阶段的修改及条约的更新情况，并因此加以分析总结，得出在立法统一适用上表现为欧盟工作模式条约、欧盟理事会制定的规则及欧盟委员会制定的规则、指令和决定等三个层次。其次，在欧盟竞争法体系中，对市场支配地位的认定需要明确相关市场，包括产品市场、地域市场、时间市场三个因素。《欧盟工作模式条约》第102条是欧盟竞争法的核心条款之一，运用概况加列举的方式对滥用市场支配地位行为进行规制。通过对条文的解读及对滥用市场支配地位行为的构成要件及滥用行为的分类及表现形式进行分析，从而采取相应的法律措施来有效地规制滥用市场支配地位行为。第二部分主要通过司法案例的方式对滥用市场支配地位行为进行分类实证研究。首先介绍了滥用市场支配地位行为的两个抗辩原则，尽管欧盟不愿意使用“合理规则”这一术语，而宁愿使用“客观必要性原则”的说法，但是在立法和实践中欧盟已经越来越多的考虑合理原则的分析方法。其次，在实践中的立场上，实施滥用行为是欧盟法院界定滥用支配地位的立足点；在认定支配地位滥用的标准上，认为具有支配地位的企业要承担相对较多的社会责任，从而有利于保护市场上的中小竞争者。最后通过两个典型案例来具体阐述并分析欧盟竞争法对滥用市场支配地位的规制在实践中是如何运用的，包括实践中存在的问题及欧盟法院与成员国法院之间的关系分析等。第三部分主要立足于宏观分析及归纳总结，通过对上文欧盟对滥用市场支配地位规制的立法分析、司法阐述及与我国的比较分析，来总结出欧盟竞争法的成功经验，并力图为我国反垄断法在对滥用市场支配地位规制的立法及司法实践方面提供一些有益的启示和借鉴。
[Abstract]:As one of the most influential competition law systems in the world, EU competition law has a more mature framework to regulate the abuse of market dominance, and also provides a relatively perfect European model for related legislation in other countries, and has produced a positive effect on its antitrust legislation on the abuse of the dominant position of the market. From the point of view of legislation, the primary goal of the EU competition law is to maintain a free and equal competition order and open market economic environment. The position of an enterprise in the market determines his competitive ability and level. The dominant enterprises in the competitive market occupy an obvious advantage, if it is not used properly. The dominant position may cause the market force to be destroyed. How to determine the dominant position of the market, the rational regulation of the abuse of the dominant position in the market, and how to prevent the private law from being used to restrict the competition are an important issue in both the legislation of competition law and the judicial practice. The legal regulation of market dominant position is not only necessary in theory, but also to protect the free and open market and consumers' rights and interests, and to safeguard the unification of Europe open market also has very important practical significance.
This paper is divided into three parts, a total of more than 30000 words. The use of economic analysis, comparative analysis, empirical analysis and case analysis methods, focusing on the analysis of the legislation and practice of the legal regulation of the abuse of market dominance.
The first part mainly expounds the legislative provisions of the EU Competition Law on the abuse of dominant position in the market. First, it systematically combs the development level of the EU competition law from the perspective of historical development, expounds the changes of the various stages of the EU competition law and the renewal of the treaty, and thus analyses and summarizes the legislative unity. It is applicable to the three levels of the EU working model treaty, the rules formulated by the European Council and the rules, instructions and decisions made by the European Commission. Secondly, in the EU competition law system, the identification of market dominance needs clear related markets, including three factors such as product market, regional market and time market. < European Union 'work. The 102nd article of the model treaty is one of the core clauses of the EU competition law. It uses an overview and enumeration to regulate the abuse of the dominant position in the market. Through the interpretation of the provisions and the analysis of the elements of the abuse of market dominance and the classification and expression of the abuse behavior, the corresponding legal measures are taken. To effectively regulate the abuse of market dominance.
The second part mainly classifies the misuse of market dominance behavior through judicial cases. First, it introduces the two defense principles of abusing market dominant position, although the EU is reluctant to use the term "reasonable rules" and prefers to use the "principle of objectivity of objectivity", but it is in legislation and In practice, the European Union has increasingly considered the analytical method of rational principles. Secondly, in the position of practice, the implementation of abuse is the foothold of the European Court to define the abuse of dominant position; in the standard of determining the abuse of dominant position, it is considered that the dominant enterprises should bear relatively more social responsibility and thus benefit To protect the small and medium competitors on the market. Finally, two typical cases are used to elaborate and analyze the application of the EU competition law to the abuse of market dominance in practice, including the problems in practice and the analysis of the relationship between the EU court and the court of the member states.
The third part is mainly based on the macro analysis and summary. Through the legislative analysis, judicial exposition and comparative analysis of the abuse of market dominance in the European Union, the successful experience of the EU competition law is summed up, and the legislation and judicial practice of the regulation of the dominant position of the anti monopoly law in the indiscriminate market in China is drawn. Some useful revelations and lessons are provided.
【学位授予单位】：贵州民族大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D912.29;D814.1

【参考文献】