论澳大利亚和东帝汶关于帝汶海海洋划界和资源争端的解决

发布时间：2018-06-27 07:37

本文选题：澳大利亚 + 东帝汶　；参考：《外交学院》2010年硕士论文

【摘要】： 海洋划界和资源纠纷一直是国际关系和国际法研究领域的热点。澳大利亚和东帝汶之间的帝汶海争端就是典型的以争夺资源占有和分配权为中心的海洋领土争端,该争端以其自身独特的复杂性吸引了国际社会的广泛关注。澳东帝汶海争端的特殊性和复杂性主要体现在两个方面,一是划界和资源争端与东帝汶的政治演变过程交织在一起,二是争端双方存在明显的实力差距。澳东帝汶海争端是通过外交谈判的方式解决的。谈判历时六年多之久,过程曲折而复杂,最终双方同意暂时搁置主权争议,在共同合作区范围内对争端海域的油气资源进行共同开发,并就有关制度安排签订了条约,为油气资源开发活动提供了稳定的法律依据。这一结果的达成是双方互相妥协的结果,在一定程度上使双方的利益都得到了满足。但深入探讨不难发现,虽然澳大利亚和东帝汶是两个实力悬殊的谈判力量,而且东帝汶的国家发展对澳大利亚的援助还存在较强的依赖性,但是在整个谈判过程中,澳大利亚却一直属于相对被动的一方,最后的谈判结果与澳大利亚最初的谈判目标相距甚远。本文将对澳东帝汶海争端的来龙去脉做出深入分析。以东帝汶的国家独立和发展史为时间轴线,探讨葡属东帝汶时期、印尼非法占领时期、联合国过渡管理时期以及东帝汶正式独立后四个时期内帝汶争端的解决情况,总结出澳东帝汶海争端的解决思路以及制约双方谈判行为选择的因素,特别是对双方为什么会在谈判中妥协作出合理解释。
[Abstract]:Maritime delimitation and resource disputes have always been a hot topic in the field of international relations and international law. The Timor Sea dispute between Australia and East Timor is a typical maritime territorial dispute centered on the competition for the possession and distribution of resources, which has attracted extensive attention of the international community for its unique complexity. The particularity and complexity of the Macao East Timor Sea dispute are mainly reflected in two aspects: one is that the demarcation and resource disputes are intertwined with the political evolution process of East Timor, and the other is the obvious power gap between the two parties to the dispute. The dispute over Australia's East Timor Sea was settled through diplomatic negotiations. The negotiations lasted more than six years, and the process was tortuous and complicated. Finally, the two sides agreed to temporarily shelve the sovereignty dispute, jointly exploit the oil and gas resources in the disputed waters within the scope of the joint cooperation zone, and signed a treaty on relevant institutional arrangements. It provides a stable legal basis for the exploitation of oil and gas resources. This result is the result of compromise between the two sides, to a certain extent, the interests of both sides have been satisfied. However, it is not difficult to find that although Australia and East Timor are two powerful negotiating forces, and there is still a strong dependence on assistance to Australia for national development in East Timor, during the whole negotiation process, Australia, however, has always been a relatively passive party, and the final outcome is far from Australia's original goal. This article will make the thorough analysis to the Australia East Timor Sea dispute origin and origin. Taking East Timor's national independence and history of development as the axis of time, this paper explores the settlement of the Timorese dispute during the period of Portuguese East Timor, the period of illegal Indonesian occupation, the transitional administration of the United Nations and the four periods following the formal independence of East Timor, This paper sums up the ideas of the settlement of the dispute over the Sea of East Timor in Australia and the factors restricting the choice of negotiation behavior between the two sides, especially the reasonable explanation of why the two sides compromise in the negotiation.
【学位授予单位】：外交学院
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2010
【分类号】：D815.3

【引证文献】