“规范”和“市

发布时间：2018-06-28 07:40

本文选题：欧盟力量 + 规范性力量　；参考：《欧洲研究》2015年02期

【摘要】：本文从西方学术界21世纪初关于欧盟力量的讨论出发,追踪了欧债危机背景下"规范性力量欧洲"在本体论、认识论、方法论层面出现的新变化及其与"市场性力量欧洲"之间展开的辩论。文章认为,尽管两种理论模式在"规范"和"市场"何者是欧盟力量本质特征的问题上存有分歧,但二者间最终呈现的融合与互补态势反映了欧盟通过塑造国际规则和规范实现战略利益的对外政策常态。与此同时,规范性力量研究议程呈现出更具包容性和多样性的取向,特别是将经济自由主义和市场性原则纳入欧盟核心规范体系,欧洲中心论松动等也在一定程度上是西方学术界反思欧盟力量相对下降和国际力量格局变化的新现实后做出的回应,对于我们理解欧盟在国际规范、国际秩序演变中的角色具有重要的理论和政策意义。
[Abstract]:Based on the discussion of EU power in western academic circles in the early 21st century, this paper traces the "normative power Europe" in ontology and epistemology under the background of European debt crisis. New changes in Methodology and the debate with Market Power Europe. The article argues that, although there are differences between the two theoretical models on what is the essential characteristic of EU power, the "norm" and "market" However, the fusion and complementarity between the two reflect the EU's normal foreign policy of realizing strategic interests by shaping international rules and norms. At the same time, the normative forces research agenda takes on a more inclusive and diverse approach, in particular the integration of economic liberalism and market principles into the EU core normative system, The loosening of the Eurocentric theory is also, to a certain extent, a response made by the western academic circles after reflecting on the new reality of the relative decline of the EU's power and the changes in the pattern of international power. To our understanding of the EU's international norms, The role in the evolution of the international order has important theoretical and policy significance.
【作者单位】：北京外国语大学英语学院英国研究中心;
【分类号】：F15;D814.1

【共引文献】