论欧洲主权债务危机视角下的美国金融霸权
发布时间:2018-07-08 14:04
本文选题:欧洲主权债务危机 + 美国金融霸权 ; 参考:《兰州大学》2013年硕士论文
【摘要】:肇始于2009年的欧洲主权债务危机已三年有余,时至今日,在欧盟各国的共同努力下,欧元区已逐渐摆脱危机,欧洲一体化重新走向正轨。本次欧洲主权债为危机的发生,与欧元区国家的内部机制有着不可分割的原因。但是,其外部因素也是一个不可忽视的部分。本文主要从美国的金融霸权视角来分析美国的金融霸权对欧洲的影响,特别是在本次欧洲债务危机中的作用。 美国是当今世界唯一的超级大国,形成了多领域、多方位和多层次的霸权体系。金融霸权是美国主要霸权形式之一,也是美国维系其霸权地位的重要手段。最为世界上第一经济大国,美国在全球金融领域内形成了巨大的优势。但随着欧盟的不断发展壮大,欧洲一体化继续向纵深发展,实现了金融一体化,欧元也随之诞生。这使得美国感到来自欧洲一体化对美国形成挑战的压力,尤其是在金融领域,欧元的出现使得美元地位受到前所未有的威胁。这促使美国开始调整和改变原有策略,逐步在战略层面和实践层面对欧洲一体化展开制约和阻碍。而本次欧债危机的发生前后美国的种种措施从深层次体现出美国的这种战略意图。 本文首先分析了美国霸权金融霸权的形成与机制,从理论和现实阐述了美国的霸权和金融霸权的思想与实践。继而从欧洲一体化和欧元的诞生说起,说明欧洲一体化和欧元对美国金融霸权的挑战。具体到本此欧债危机,则分析了欧债危机发生的内在原因,以及蕴藏其中的美国因素,论述了美国在欧债危机中的获得的战略利益和连带损失,并推导出欧洲一体化的发展趋势和美国霸权在后欧债危机时代的走向。 本文认为,欧债危机对欧洲一体化带来了暂时的影响,但对欧洲一体化的长远趋势来说,是一个发现和纠正问题的机会,危机后的欧洲一体化将继续走向深度融合。与此同时,美国霸权的衰落是一个不可避免的历史趋势,在欧债危机之后,美国的金融霸权不仅要面临欧元区的挑战,而且会遭受新兴市场国家的强有力的挑战。 文章最后从本此欧债危机的经验和教训中提出了对中国金融安全问题的几点思考。中国应该避免欧洲国家的高福利模式,保持货币政策的独立性,并要重视政府债务问题,从而积极稳妥地推进人民币国际化,安全稳健地融入国际金融体系,形成与经济地位相对称的金融力量,逐步肩负起大国责任,真正实现金融领域的“中国梦”!
[Abstract]:After more than three years of Europe's sovereign debt crisis, which began in 2009, the euro zone has emerged from the crisis and European integration is back on track, thanks to a concerted effort by the European Union. The European sovereign debt crisis, and the internal mechanism of the euro zone countries have an inseparable reason. However, its external factors are also a part that can not be ignored. This paper analyzes the impact of American financial hegemony on Europe from the perspective of American financial hegemony, especially its role in the European debt crisis. The United States is the world's sole superpower, forming a multi-field, multi-directional and multi-level hegemonic system. Financial hegemony is one of the main forms of American hegemony, and it is also an important means for the United States to maintain its hegemonic position. The largest economic power in the world, the United States in the global financial field has formed a huge advantage. However, with the continuous development of the European Union, European integration continued to develop in depth, financial integration was realized, and the euro was born. That makes the United States feel pressure from European integration to challenge the United States, especially in the financial sector, where the emergence of the euro poses an unprecedented threat to the dollar's position. This prompted the United States to adjust and change its original strategy and gradually restrict and hinder European integration at the strategic and practical levels. Before and after the European debt crisis, the United States measures reflect the strategic intention of the United States from a deep level. This paper first analyzes the formation and mechanism of American hegemonic financial hegemony, and expounds the thought and practice of American hegemony and financial hegemony from theory and reality. Then from the European integration and the birth of the euro, it explains the challenge of European integration and euro to American financial hegemony. In this paper, the internal causes of the European debt crisis and the American factors are analyzed, and the strategic benefits and associated losses of the United States in the European debt crisis are discussed. The development trend of European integration and the trend of American hegemony in post-European debt crisis era are deduced. This paper holds that the European debt crisis has a temporary impact on European integration, but for the long-term trend of European integration, it is an opportunity to find and correct the problems, and the post-crisis European integration will continue to be deeply integrated. At the same time, the decline of American hegemony is an inevitable historical trend. After the European debt crisis, American financial hegemony will face not only the challenge from the euro zone, but also the strong challenge from emerging market countries. Finally, this paper puts forward some thoughts on China's financial security from the experiences and lessons of this European debt crisis. China should avoid the high welfare model of European countries, maintain the independence of monetary policy, and attach importance to the issue of government debt, so as to actively and steadily promote the internationalization of the renminbi and integrate safely and steadily into the international financial system. Form the financial power which is symmetrical with the economic status, gradually shoulder the responsibility of the big country, truly realize the "Chinese Dream" in the financial field!
【学位授予单位】:兰州大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:D871.2
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 姚大庆;;货币权力和国际货币体系的美元霸权[J];商业研究;2010年06期
2 马骏;;欧债危机以及对中国的影响[J];国际融资;2011年10期
3 陶文昭;;警惕美国的软霸权[J];高校理论战线;2007年05期
4 白钦先;黄鑫;;美元霸权和信用评级垄断支撑美国霸权[J];高校理论战线;2010年12期
5 廖泽芳;雷达;;欧债危机背后的货币博弈[J];国际金融研究;2012年11期
6 周永垒;;军事软实力的内涵和本质[J];海军工程大学学报(综合版);2010年02期
7 何帆;;欧洲主权债务危机与美国债务风险的比较分析[J];欧洲研究;2010年04期
8 丁纯;;从希腊债务危机看后危机时代欧盟的经济社会状况[J];求是;2010年07期
9 徐涛;侯绍泽;;论美元霸权与当代国际货币秩序[J];上海财经大学学报;2007年06期
10 陈新;;欧债危机源于救助机制失调[J];社会观察;2011年10期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 杨国庆;从亚洲金融危机看美国金融霸权[D];复旦大学;2007年
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 张磊;论欧元对欧盟的政治影响[D];河北师范大学;2009年
,本文编号:2107680
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/waijiao/2107680.html