1921—1922年厦门海后滩案与中英交涉研究

发布时间：2018-07-20 12:10

【摘要】：厦门海后滩案缘于光绪四年海后滩章程中英文本含义的歧义,英方不顾厦门官民抗议,强行将其并入租界,最终引发旷日持久的抵制风潮。厦门公民会利用地域乡情及闽籍华侨所具有的地方性与国际化特点,使海后滩案从局限于厦门的地方悬案转为海内外闽籍华人关注的重要事件。福建地方当局的默许与支持,为该组织的运作提供了相对宽松的政治空间。英方初始并未将英商经济利益置于首位,基于传统的条约体制思维,采取强硬立场,忽视了中国民族主义的影响。太古洋行遭受严重经济损失,尤其是香港海员大罢工的爆发迫使英方改从现实利益出发,以海后滩权益的让步,换取风潮的终结。北洋外交部初期对海后滩案的漠视与不作为,使得该案悬而不决,此后在民众压力下被迫介入海案交涉,但其在国际外交与国内权威的弱势态势,使其发挥的作用极为有限,由此亦可窥知北洋外交所具有的局限性与缺陷。
[Abstract]:The Xiamen Haihutan case was caused by the ambiguity of the English meaning of the Guang Xu's four-year charter of Haihou Beach. The British side ignored the protest of Xiamen officials and people and forcibly incorporated it into the concession, which eventually led to a protracted boycott. The Xiamen Citizen Association makes use of the regional situation and the local and international characteristics of the overseas Chinese of Fujian nationality to change the Haihutan case from a local unsolved case confined to Xiamen to an important event of concern to the Chinese of Fujian nationality at home and abroad. The acquiescence and support of Fujian local authorities provided relatively loose political space for the operation of the organization. Initially, the British side did not put British business economic interests first, based on the traditional thinking of the treaty system, taking a tough stance, ignoring the influence of Chinese nationalism. Swire suffered serious economic losses, especially the outbreak of the Hong Kong Seafarers strike, forcing the British side to proceed from the actual interests of the beach rights concessions, in exchange for the end of the storm. The initial indifference and omission of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs to the Haihutan case left the case hanging, and subsequently forced the Ministry of Foreign Affairs to intervene in the case under popular pressure, but its weak situation in international diplomacy and domestic authority made it play a very limited role. From this, we can see the limitations and defects of Beiyang diplomacy.
【作者单位】：南开大学历史学院;
【分类号】：D829.561

【参考文献】