规范变迁与身份再造:主权零死亡时代大国崛起战略之路径重构

发布时间：2018-12-17 15:14

【摘要】：在体系规范进化的主权国家零死亡时代,崛起国奉行"安全搭车与推责"的"联系性崛起战略"较奉行传统的"安全自助"的"变位性崛起战略"要面临更小的结构压力与冲突风险。单纯比较崛起国与霸权国二者权力位差的误区在于,它从根本上忽略了崛起国需要面对整个霸权国的全球联盟体系以及只有高出社会基本需求的人均国内生产总值部分才是真正衡量超级大国间潜在资源转化能力的根本要素这两大基本事实,这也是崛起进程中崛起国学者提出放弃"韬光养晦"转向激进外交政策的根源。在全球化时代,海权战略应服从于国家崛起的整体战略,海权所承载的更多的是"海运"而非海军。大国崛起应是一个水到渠成、实至名归的过程。
[Abstract]:In the era of zero death for sovereign states that evolved in a system of norms, The rising countries should face less structural pressure and conflict risk than the traditional "security self-help" strategy of "shifting rise" by pursuing the strategy of "safe riding and pushing responsibility". The mistake of comparing the power level difference between the rising power and the hegemonic power lies in, It fundamentally ignores the fact that the rising powers have to face the global alliance system of the entire hegemonic power and that only a portion of GDP per capita that is higher than the basic needs of society is a true measure of the potential resource conversion capacity between superpowers. The two basic facts of the fundamental elements, This is also the root of the rise of scholars to abandon the "hide their strength and hide their light" and turn to radical foreign policy. In the era of globalization, the sea power strategy should be subject to the overall strategy of the rise of a country. The sea power carries more "sea transport" than the navy. The rise of a great power should be a natural and worthy process.
【作者单位】：哈尔滨工程大学马克思主义学院形势与政策研究中心;国立莫斯科国际关系学院;
【基金】：2011年教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目“国际体系变革与中国国际秩序观研究”(项目编号:11JZD047)的研究成果
【分类号】：D80

【参考文献】