中美两国在朝核危机中的政策比较研究
[Abstract]:Since the first North Korean nuclear crisis broke out in the early 1990s, the Korean nuclear issue has plagued the Korean Peninsula and even Northeast Asia for more than 20 years. During this period, the North Korean nuclear issue has experienced several upgrades in 2002, 2009 and 2013, and has also developed from the game between North Korea and the United States into the core of security issues in Northeast Asia. From the initial bilateral contacts between the DPRK and the United States to the quadripartite talks, the tripartite talks and the six-party talks under the multilateral framework, it has now involved several of the most influential countries in the world. As a result, it not only becomes the core of the security problems in Northeast Asia, but also becomes the focus of international politics and becomes the top problem of global security. Therefore, in view of the importance of the DPRK nuclear issue to the national interests of China and the significant impact of the diplomatic decisions made by China and the United States on the relations between the two countries over the North Korean nuclear crisis, It is necessary for scholars to make a systematic and detailed comparative study on the interaction process and policy comparison between China and the United States on the Korean nuclear issue. Based on the Korean nuclear crisis, this paper makes a detailed comparison of the foreign policy of China and the United States in the past North Korean nuclear crisis by means of comparative analysis, literature analysis and historical analysis. In this paper, on the basis of combing the origin and influence of the previous North Korean nuclear crisis, the historical origin of the crisis is deeply explored, with the emphasis on the systematic analysis of the new round of North Korean nuclear crisis, which is in the process of brewing and upgrading. The impact of the North Korean nuclear crisis on China and the United States is also discussed. Then it summarizes the diplomatic decisions of China and the United States in the past North Korean nuclear crisis and the influencing factors of adopting this policy. Finally, combining the contents of the previous parts, the author draws a conclusion that the policy differences and similarities between China and the United States in dealing with the North Korean nuclear issue are influenced by many factors, such as national interests, geopolitics, security strategies, historical reasons, and so on. This part is also the focus and essence of this article. At the end of the article, the future policy of China and the United States on the North Korean nuclear issue is prospected. China and the United States continue to interact closely on the future resolution of the North Korean nuclear issue. This is determined both by the national interests of the two countries and by the nature of the North Korean nuclear issue.
【学位授予单位】:辽宁大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D815.2
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 戢治强;朝核危机发展态势探析[J];湖北行政学院学报;2004年01期
2 张琏瑰;;朝核危机:危险仍然存在[J];世界知识;2006年03期
3 白云扬;;朝核危机中的“六方会谈”[J];科学时代;2008年04期
4 邓集龙;;“六方会谈”机制对朝核危机的作用及影响[J];国际资料信息;2010年09期
5 李华;;朝核危机析论[J];辽东学院学报(社会科学版);2012年04期
6 安高乐;;从朝核危机看六方会谈机制的功能[J];江苏科技大学学报(社会科学版);2012年03期
7 杨中旭;朝核危机并未脱离谈判桌[J];中国新闻周刊;2005年07期
8 沈骥如;;举世瞩目的朝核危机[J];时事报告;2006年11期
9 冯亦斐;朝核危机诡异变局:突然出现第七方[J];新闻周刊;2003年44期
10 武海荣;论和平解决朝核危机的原因和出路[J];中学政治教学参考;2004年02期
相关会议论文 前2条
1 龚克瑜;;中国对和平解决朝核问题的努力和构想[A];中国的前沿 文化复兴与秩序重构——上海市社会科学界第四届学术年会青年文集(2006年度)[C];2006年
2 谢怀江;;朝核问题对我边境地区可能的核影响及对策[A];第七届全军防原医学专业委员会第五届中国毒理学会放射毒理专业委员会学术会议论文汇编[C];2004年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 郑兴 崔亦谦;朝核危机会引“爆”吗[N];人民日报海外版;2013年
2 国际问题专家 慕容博;唯六方会谈能解朝核危机[N];人民日报海外版;2013年
3 樊吉社;博弈朝核危机:核去核从?[N];经济观察报;2013年
4 邱震海;朝核危机的下一步[N];经济观察报;2003年
5 马库斯·诺兰德;朝鲜核试验对东亚金融冲击几何[N];第一财经日报;2006年
6 樊吉社;建立互信是关键[N];人民日报;2009年
7 俞懿晗;期待一个繁荣自信的朝鲜[N];东方早报;2005年
8 蔡建;朝核危机趋缓和,究竟谁得分?[N];解放日报;2008年
9 特约评论员 樊吉社;亡羊补牢:朝核的过去与伊核的未来[N];21世纪经济报道;2008年
10 中国社科院经济所研究员 詹小洪;朝核危机背后再现中国筹码[N];中国经营报;2009年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 刘渊博;美朝核危机博弈[D];暨南大学;2010年
2 朱杰进;六方视野中的朝核危机[D];湘潭大学;2004年
3 王江波;国际合作理论与朝核危机[D];华东师范大学;2005年
4 郑丽慧;朝核问题与中国政府的对策述评[D];曲阜师范大学;2010年
5 姜辉;朝核危机对中国安全的影响及其对策研究[D];延边大学;2009年
6 郑琪;试析第二次朝核危机解决中的中美合作[D];外交学院;2010年
7 胡斌;重复囚徒困境视角下的两次朝核危机[D];华东师范大学;2011年
8 金基泰;第二次朝核危机后的韩中两国对朝政策比较研究[D];外交学院;2011年
9 李盈懿;中国政府在历次朝核危机中的外交政策分析[D];复旦大学;2012年
10 张馨;中美两国在朝核危机中的政策比较研究[D];辽宁大学;2014年
本文编号:2427626
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/waijiao/2427626.html