美国外交关系委员会研究(1921-1991)
[Abstract]:The United States Council on Foreign Relations is one of the oldest in the history of the United States and one of the most influential thoughts in foreign policy. Through the study of the American Foreign Relations Committee, we can better understand the global foreign policy and strategic concept of the United States, and grasp the future trend of its development. At the same time, through the careful examination of the history of American foreign policy, we can find that the establishment and implementation of many major foreign policy in the United States after the end of World War I have an important connection with the Committee on Foreign Relations. The purpose of this paper is to study the American Diplomatic Relations Committee, to elaborate its history and present situation, features and functions, to study its diplomatic decision in the United States and its position, role, cause and influence in the development of American foreign policy, and to explore its way of influencing the decision of American foreign policy The reason why the United States has been enduring, more dynamic and influential in the United States is to reveal the role of the United States Council on Foreign Relations in the United States foreign policy The study of the Council of Foreign Relations of the United States is subject to an interdisciplinary approach. This paper is based on the history study, in the process of organizing and analyzing the understanding and research results of the American Foreign Relations Committee as a whole, The research methods of international political science, history theory and paradigm, reference and statistical analysis, interdisciplinary research, qualitative and quantitative analysis, historical analysis and literature analysis are used to study the existing network resources and make the best possible use of the latest research methods. Using the original literature and the long-term experience of the public, it is hoped that the new problems can be found on the basis of the study of the elder scholars and form a new one. The study aims to be located in the American Council of Foreign Relations, which is divided into the following six parts: The introduction, the four chapters, the epilogue: the first part illustrates the United States The basic problems in the study of the diplomatic relations committee are as follows: one is the analysis of the present situation of the American diplomatic relations committee as one of its members at home and abroad; the other is the content and significance of the research; the third is the research method and the data source; It is the innovation and the deficiency of the research in this paper. The second part is for beauty. The first is the establishment of the Foreign Relations Committee of the United States, which includes the embryonic form of the Committee on Foreign Relations, the formal establishment of the United States Committee on Foreign Relations, the historical change of the United States Committee on Foreign Relations, the order and the members of the Committee on Foreign Relations The third part discusses the basic structure and characteristics of the American Foreign Relations Committee, and studies the following questions: First, the framework group of the United States Committee on Foreign Relations The structure of the organization and organization of the United States Council on Foreign Relations; the other is the source of funding for the United States Committee on Foreign Relations, including the United States Finance Consortium and the United States Committee on Foreign Relations, the United States Main Foundation and the United States Committee on Foreign Relations; and the third, the Foreign Affairs Quarterly. > The Foreign Relations Committee of the United States, which includes the Foreign Affairs Quarterly, the United States Foreign Policy and the Foreign Policy of the United States The fourth part is an all-round analysis of the elite politics and the American Council of Foreign Relations, one is the important members of the United States Committee on Foreign Relations and the analysis, and these important members mainly including the President, the Vice-President, the Secretary of State, the Minister of Defence, the Director of the CIA, the Minister of Finance, the President's National Security Service Assistant, and so on; the second is the report of the senior officials of the United States Government and the Council of Foreign Relations referred to in the statement of the head of the important sector, including the President of the United States and the Vice-President in the exercise The Foreign Relations Committee referred to in the report, the statement, the Council of Foreign Relations referred to in the statement of the Secretary of State, the Minister of Defence, the head of the CIA, and the influence of the members of the United States Committee on Foreign Relations in the main media, including the diplomatic relations of the United States the influence of the Committee with the main media, the American Council on Foreign Relations on the main media, the Fourth United States Committee on Foreign Relations and the elite, including the elite and the United States The effect of the American Council on Foreign Relations and the influence of the American Foreign Relations Committee on the American foreign policy has been explained in the fifth part (case analysis), which mainly has two aspects, one is the involvement of the United States South-East Asian conflicts and wars, including the recognition of the strategic position of Southeast Asia by the United States Committee on Foreign Relations, the ongoing study of the United States Council on Foreign Relations on the issue of South-East Asia, the position of the members of the United States Committee on Foreign Relations and the United States Government on the conflict and war in South-East Asia, and the other The normalization of the system, including the United States Diplomatic Relations Committee before the thawing of Sino-US relations The members will pay close attention to China's problems, and the U.S. Committee on Foreign Relations has studied and applied the Chinese issues. The sixth part is the conclusion of the full text, and the historical status of the American Council on Foreign Relations is evaluated.
【学位授予单位】:东北师范大学
【学位级别】:博士
【学位授予年份】:2010
【分类号】:D871.2
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 曹凤中 ,王玉振 ,栾怡;美国外交和全球环境的挑战[J];环境科学动态;1996年03期
2 杨夏鸣;美国的中东问题研究:理论、论战与影响[J];美国研究;2004年03期
3 王朝晖;;“文化大革命”初期的美国对华政策[J];美国研究;2006年04期
4 马建勋;韩隽;魏雪梅;;谈美国的“新干涉主义”及影响[J];哈尔滨学院学报;2007年04期
5 马建勋;韩隽;;谈美国的“新干涉主义”及影响[J];绥化学院学报;2007年02期
6 王娟娟;;冷战时期的美国外交[J];南京大学学报(哲学.人文科学.社会科学版);2007年06期
7 魏范京;;美国政府外交政策中对软权力的使用[J];时代人物;2008年10期
8 廉欢;;“克林顿主义”外交政策回顾与分析[J];吉林省教育学院学报(学科版);2008年12期
9 房广顺;唐彦林;;奥巴马政府的二十国集团战略评析[J];美国研究;2011年02期
10 闻言;大伟;;在美国驻华使馆外[J];北京纪事;1996年04期
相关会议论文 前9条
1 王立新;;从历史的角度看美国外交中的意识形态[A];北京论坛(2004)文明的和谐与共同繁荣:“多文化共存下的记忆与遗忘”历史分论坛论文或摘要集[C];2004年
2 汪段泳;;想象中的帝国与帝国的想象——从“帝国电影”中看美国霸权外交的社会民意基础[A];上海市社会科学界第五届学术年会文集(2007年度)(世界经济·国际政治·国际关系学科卷)[C];2007年
3 谢慧;;《今日评论》的对美观察[A];中国社会科学院近代史研究所青年学术论坛(2008年卷)[C];2009年
4 方平;;梁士诒与“洪宪帝制”[A];近代中国(第十辑)[C];2000年
5 崔志海;;关于美国第一次退还部分庚款的几个问题[A];中国社会科学院近代史研究所青年学术论坛2003年卷[C];2003年
6 王晓德;;西属美洲殖民地的独立与“两个半球”理论的形成[A];中国拉丁美洲史研究会第17届年会暨“纪念拉美独立200周年”学术讨论会论文集[C];2010年
7 田丹;;美国为什么总是指责中国的人权?[A];忘年交书简五十封[C];2007年
8 叶自成;;金融危机与后极化格局的形成与演进[A];北京论坛(2009)文明的和谐与共同繁荣——危机的挑战、反思与和谐发展:“危机影响下世界格局的变化与调整”国际关系分论坛论文或摘要集[C];2009年
9 魏红霞;;美国对古巴的公众外交及其效果评估(1959年至今)[A];中国拉丁美洲史研究会第17届年会暨“纪念拉美独立200周年”学术讨论会论文集[C];2010年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 王仪忻 国际问题专家;美国外交要向新多边主义转变?[N];世界报;2005年
2 孟方;希拉里:“巧实力”凸显美国外交新路线[N];中国国防报;2009年
3 郭京花;赖斯:管美国外交,,还管别国内政?[N];新华每日电讯;2005年
4 王姗姗;维基解密成为美国外交“灾难”[N];工人日报;2010年
5 早报记者 吴挺;“后拉丹时代”美国外交思变[N];东方早报;2011年
6 张U
本文编号:2479113
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/waijiao/2479113.html