法理与罪责:国民政府对战犯谷寿夫审判的再认识

发布时间：2018-01-18 09:36

本文关键词：法理与罪责:国民政府对战犯谷寿夫审判的再认识　出处：《江海学刊》2013年06期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：有关战犯谷寿夫的战争责任及法庭审判的公正性,在战后引起较多争议,特别是日本右翼及旧军人团体多认为对谷寿夫的判决实属"冤枉"。南京军事法庭以谷寿夫作为南京大屠杀案的重要案犯,并非是在无法引渡更多相关责任人到华受审的情况下为结案而以谷寿夫作为替罪的罪魁。法庭对于谷寿夫战争责任的认定建立在对侵华日军南京大屠杀暴行事实全面调查的基础之上,对谷寿夫罪责判决的同时也明确了其他相关战犯的共同责任,可见法庭的理性和客观。限于当时的条件,审判所需的相关证据的调查工作存在一定的缺失,加之在战争暴行的发生地审判,被告确实处于一定的弱势地位,但从整体来看,并不影响审判的公正性。
[Abstract]:The war responsibility of war criminal Gu Shoufu and the fairness of the court trial caused more controversy after the war. In particular, Japanese right-wing and former military organizations considered that the verdict against Gu Shoufu was "unjustly". Nanjing military Court took him as an important criminal in the Nanjing Massacre case. It is not in the absence of the extradition of more of those responsible to be tried in China that Mr. Gu Shoufu is the culprit for the case. The court's determination of Mr. Gu's responsibility for the war is based on the atrocity of the Nanjing Massacre of the Japanese invading China. On the basis of a full investigation. At the same time, it also defines the common responsibility of other relevant war criminals. It can be seen that the rationality and objectivity of the court. Limited to the conditions at that time, there is a certain deficiency in the investigation work of the relevant evidence needed in the trial. In addition, the defendant is in a certain vulnerable position in the place where the war atrocities occur, but overall, it does not affect the fairness of the trial.
【作者单位】：南京师范大学历史学系;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学研究基金青年项目“国民政府对南京大屠杀案的审判研究”(项目号:11YHC770074)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D929;K153
【正文快照】： 日本投降后,为彰显国际正义,追究战争责任,盟国在东京组织远东国际军事法庭审判甲级战犯,同时国民政府也在国内各地设立军事法庭审判乙丙级战犯。战后对日本战犯审判的争论自开庭之日就已开始,至今仍辩难不息。日本右翼一直试图否认战后盟国对日本战犯审判的公正性,试图为战争

【参考文献】