试析“殖民地近代化论”

发布时间：2018-02-03 21:25

本文关键词： 殖民地近代化论经济增长率物质设施殖民史观　出处：《延边大学》2007年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】： 光复后，韩国学界着力于研究日帝的殖民统治和朝鲜人民的民族解放运动，从而普及并树立民族主义史观，进而克服日帝的“殖民史观”。然而，，进入20世纪80年代中后期，艰难维持下来的韩国学界的主流研究受到了所谓“殖民地近代化论”的严峻挑战。 “殖民地近代化论”主张日帝殖民地时期，朝鲜总督府为朝鲜铺设铁路、建立工厂、矿山等，从而实现了朝鲜的近代化，同时认为韩国1960年以后的经济发展起源于日帝殖民地时期，是该时期的延续。本论文以“殖民地近代化论”为线索，从经济史学和史学两个角度分析其产生的历史脉络及原因，对殖民地时期所谓的“发展”，即殖民地时期的表面经济增长率和日帝所留下的物质设施，进行合理的分析和解释，进而全面批判“殖民地近代化论”。全文由绪论、本论和结论三个部分组成。第一章绪论，简略阐明了本论文的现实意义和历史意义以及研究的目的，详细总结了中、朝、韩、日对“殖民地近代化论”的研究动态和现存的问题，并且说明了撰写本论文的方法和创新点。本论由第二章、第三章、第四章构成。第二章主要论述“殖民地近代化论”的背景，讲述了“殖民地近代化论”的概念，以便把握整篇文章有一个准确的尺度。从历史和理论的角度，对日本和韩国的朝鲜史研究状况进行考察，明确了“殖民地近代化论”的理论渊源。总结出“殖民地近代化论”能够在韩国得以接受并传播的原因。第三章主要从经济文化的角度对“殖民地近代化论”进行分析和批判。从殖民地时期农业政策中的“土地调查事业”和“大米增产计划”进行论述，阐明所谓殖民地农业近代化的真相。分时期论述殖民地时期工业和工业政策来论证工业近代化的真相。最后，从政治文化方面阐述，殖民地近代化的虚伪性。第四章从历史的角度批判“殖民地近代化论”。从殖民地时期之前的历史中找出能够反驳“殖民地近代化论”的论据，即从“资本主义萌芽论”和“内在发展论”的角度进行批判。阐述殖民地时期所谓的经济增长与日帝所留下的物质设施，如铁路、工厂等的实质，论证这些与殖民地近代化无关。最后，在光复后与殖民地时期的关系中，论证殖民地时期与光复后没有延续性。第五章结论，总结了本论文所解决的问题和论文撰写过程中的新认识，分析“殖民地近代化论”的影响。
[Abstract]:After the restoration, the Korean academic circles devoted themselves to studying the Japanese emperor's colonial rule and the Korean people's national liberation movement, thus popularizing and establishing the historical view of nationalism, and then overcoming the Japanese emperor's "colonial historical view". In the middle and late period of 1980s, the mainstream research of Korean academic circles, which was hard to maintain, was challenged by the so-called "colonial modernization theory". "the theory of colonial modernization" advocates that during the period of the Japanese emperor's colony, the Korean Government House laid railways, set up factories and mines for the DPRK, thus realizing the modernization of Korea. At the same time, the economic development of Korea after 1960 originated from the colonial period of Japan and Emperor, which is the continuation of that period. This thesis takes "the theory of colonial modernization" as the clue, analyzes its historical context and reasons from the two angles of economic history and historiography, and analyzes the so-called "development" in the colonial period. In other words, the superficial economic growth rate during the colonial period and the material facilities left by the Japanese emperor were analyzed and explained reasonably, and the theory of colonial modernization was criticized comprehensively. The full text consists of three parts: introduction, theory and conclusion. The first chapter is introduction, which briefly expounds the realistic and historical significance of this thesis and the purpose of the research, and summarizes the research trends and existing problems of the theory of colonial modernization in China, North Korea, South Korea and Japan in detail. It also explains the method and innovation of writing this paper. This theory consists of chapter two, chapter three and chapter 4th. The second chapter mainly discusses the background of "Colonial Modernization", and describes the concept of "Colonial Modernization", in order to grasp the entire article has an accurate yardstick, from the historical and theoretical perspective. This paper investigates the study of Korean history in Japan and South Korea, clarifies the theoretical origin of "colonial modernization theory", and summarizes the reasons why "colonial modernization theory" can be accepted and disseminated in South Korea. The third chapter mainly analyzes and criticizes "the theory of colonial modernization" from the angle of economy and culture, and discusses the "land survey" and "rice increase plan" in the agricultural policy of the colonial period. This paper expounds the truth of the so-called colonial agricultural modernization. It discusses the industrial and industrial policies in the colonial period to demonstrate the truth of industrial modernization. Finally, from the political and cultural point of view, the hypocrisy of colonial modernization is expounded. Chapter 4th criticizes "the theory of colonial modernization" from the historical point of view, and finds out the arguments which can refute the theory of "colonial modernization" from the history before the colonial period. From the perspective of "the budding of capitalism" and "the theory of internal development", this paper expounds the so-called economic growth during the colonial period and the substance of the material facilities left by the Japanese emperor, such as railways, factories, etc. Finally, in the relationship between the restoration and the colonial period, there is no continuity between the colonial period and the restoration period. The conclusion of chapter 5th summarizes the problems solved in this paper and the new understanding in the process of writing the paper and analyzes the influence of "the theory of colonial modernization".
【学位授予单位】：延边大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2007
【分类号】：K312.4

【共引文献】