李重夏与“土门”、图们“两江说”

发布时间：2018-02-24 05:20

本文关键词： 土门图们江李重夏　出处：《中国边疆史地研究》2012年01期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：19世纪末,朝鲜王朝向清王朝提出穆克登碑文所标示的界河"土门"不是图们江,而是海兰河(后来改为黄花松沟子),中朝两国应以"土门"分界。为此,双方进行了两次界务谈判。谈判中,朝鲜李重夏虽然坚决主张"土门"非今图们江的"两江说",但其实知晓这一观点是错误的。界务谈判后,李重夏以"别单"形式几次撰文上奏政府,阐述了他对"两江说"的真实看法,论证了"土门"即图们江、图们江自朝鲜王朝初年就已是中朝两国界河的史实,揭露了"两江说"的策划者是鱼允中,被朝鲜称为"分界江"的布尔哈通河与现实界河毫不相关等。
[Abstract]:At the end of 19th century, the Korean dynasty proposed to the Qing Dynasty that the boundary river "Tumen" as marked by the inscription on the Mukden inscription was not the Tumen River, but rather the Hailan River (later changed to Huang Hua Song Gouzi), the boundary between China and North Korea should be divided by "Tumen". The two sides held two negotiations on border affairs. During the talks, Lee Chong-shia of the DPRK insisted that "Tumen" is not the "two Rivers" of the present Tumen River, but in fact knew that this view was wrong. After the negotiations on border affairs, Li Chongxia wrote several times in the form of "Beidan" to play the government, expounded his true views on the "theory of the two rivers," and demonstrated that the "Tumen River" is the Tumen River, which has been the historical fact of the two rivers across the border between China and the DPRK since the beginning of the Korean Dynasty. It is revealed that the mastermind of "two Rivers" is Yuyunzhong, and the Burhaton River, which North Korea calls the "Boundary River", has nothing to do with the realistic boundary river, and so on.
【作者单位】：中国人民大学清史研究所;
【基金】：2009年度国家社会科学基金项目“中朝图们江界务研究”(项目批准号:09CZS033) 中国博士后科学基金第三批特别资助项目“中朝图们江边界史研究”(项目批准号:201003199)的阶段性研究成果韩国韩国学中央研究院提供资助(项目批准号:AKS—2009—MB—2001)
【分类号】：K256;K312.4

【参考文献】