论朝鲜停战谈判中的战俘问题

发布时间：2018-02-24 04:36

本文关键词： 朝鲜战争停战谈判战俘遣返　出处：《山西大学》2008年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】： 本文从出朝鲜战争遣返战俘问题的谈判入手,在阅读大量档案文献和国内外学者论著的基础上,对战俘问题谈判的经过进行了完整回顾。同时,本文还联系美苏冷战的国际格局,将参与谈判的各国利益与国际大背景有机结合起来,深入探讨了导致战俘问题产生、拖延、直至最终解决的根源。论文的正文除引言和结论外,共分四个部分。第一章对朝鲜战争交战双方在战争各个阶段战俘产生的情况和双方战俘总量失衡的原因进行了分析,论述了战俘问题是如何形成的。第二章主要介绍了战俘问题的初步交锋,阐述了交战双方对解决战俘问题的设想、问题的正式提出直至矛盾无法调和导致谈判中断。第三章,从谈判双方在谈判桌上的针锋相对着手,分析了受冷战局势制约的各国利益取向和由此导致的战俘问题延宕不绝的根源。第四章,论证了停战谈判得以恢复的三个重要契机,即美国打破僵局的试探、斯大林逝世后苏联政策的调整以及中国、北朝鲜的认同,使双方最终在战俘问题上达成一致,停战协定达成,朝鲜战争结束。本文遵循马列主义唯物史观的基本原则和唯物辩证法,通过分析,笔者认为:战俘问题谈判中双方谈判决策的制定均受苏美冷战格局的限约,既要争取利益的最大实现,又力图避免谈判破裂导致战争扩大。谈判拖延导致朝鲜战争又延长了一年半之久,造成了巨大的人力、物力损失,美、苏、中等参与战争的几大当事国均对此负有不可推卸的责任。通过对半个多世纪前这一历史事件的回顾,可以看到,尽管朝鲜停战谈判在战俘问题上拖延许久,但战争最终还是通过谈判的方式得到了解决,说明和平谈判是解决国际争端的有效途径,战争不是不能避免的。另外,板门店谈判中运用的谈判技巧和策略也对当今国家间谈判有着重要的借鉴意义。
[Abstract]:Starting from the negotiations on the repatriation of prisoners of war in the Korean War, this paper, on the basis of reading a large number of archival documents and the works of scholars at home and abroad, reviews the course of the negotiations on the issue of prisoners of war. At the same time, Considering the international situation of the Cold War between the United States and the Soviet Union, this paper organically combines the interests of the countries involved in the negotiations with the international background, and probes into the root causes that lead to the emergence, delay and final settlement of the issue of prisoners of war. Besides the introduction and conclusion, the main body of the thesis is divided into four parts. The first chapter analyzes the situation of prisoners of war in all stages of the Korean War and the reasons for the imbalance of the total number of prisoners of war between the two sides. This paper discusses how the question of prisoners of war is formed. The second chapter mainly introduces the preliminary confrontation of the question of prisoners of war, and expounds the ideas of the warring parties to solve the problem of prisoners of war. Starting from the tit-for-tat confrontation between the negotiating parties at the negotiating table, this paper analyzes the interests of all countries restricted by the cold war situation and the causes of the endless delay in the prisoner of war problem. Chapter 4th demonstrates three important opportunities for the resumption of the armistice negotiations. That is, the temptation of the United States to break the deadlock, the adjustment of the Soviet policy after Stalin's death, and the recognition of China and North Korea made the two sides finally reach an agreement on the issue of prisoners of war, an armistice agreement and an end to the Korean War. Following the basic principles of Marxism-Leninist historical materialism and materialistic dialectics, the author thinks that the decision-making of negotiation between the two sides in the negotiation of prisoners of war is restricted by the Cold War pattern of the Soviet Union and the United States, and it is necessary to strive for the greatest realization of interests. He also tried to avoid the breakdown of the negotiations leading to the expansion of the war. The delay in the negotiations led to the prolongation of the Korean War for another year and a half, resulting in huge human and material losses, the United States and the Soviet Union. All the major countries involved in the war in the middle bear the unshirkable responsibility for this. Looking back on this historical event more than half a century ago, we can see that despite the prolonged delay in the Korean armistice negotiations on the issue of prisoners of war, However, the war was finally resolved through negotiation, indicating that peace negotiations are an effective way to resolve international disputes, and that war is not inevitable. The negotiation techniques and strategies used in Panmunjom negotiations are also of great significance to the negotiation between countries today.
【学位授予单位】：山西大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2008
【分类号】：K153

【参考文献】