当前位置:主页 > 社科论文 > 世界历史论文 >

论朝鲜王朝前期的“华化”与“土俗”之争

发布时间:2018-02-28 23:13

  本文关键词: 华化 土俗 文化转型 出处:《暨南学报(哲学社会科学版)》2012年11期  论文类型:期刊论文


【摘要】:在高丽末期,同时存在复兴"土俗"与"华化"两种文化倾向,主要由新进士大夫阶层构成的"华化"派取得了最终的胜利,建立了朝鲜王朝,将"事大尊明"作为了王朝的基本国策,确立了全盘"华化"的方略。太宗时期,对"华化"政策的推动加速。然而,由于"华制"和半岛"土俗"之间的张力,及由此引发的民众抵制,快速推进"华化"的政策遭到了挫折,最后决定向土俗做出相当程度的妥协,以渐变代替速变。"华化"与"土俗"两种文化倾向各有其理论支持。中宗时期,又出现了一些侧重点各不相同的折中理论,这些理论看似并不排斥土俗,实际上主张的却是一种更高层次上的华化。
[Abstract]:At the end of Korea, there were two cultural tendencies of reviving "local custom" and "Chinese culture" at the same time. The "Hua Hua" school, mainly composed of the new literati and officials, won the final victory and established the Korean dynasty. Regard "Shi Da Zun Ming" as the basic national policy of the dynasty, and establish the general plan of overall "Chinese transformation". During the period of Taizong, the promotion of the "Hua Hua" policy accelerated. However, due to the tension between "Chinese system" and "local custom" on the peninsula, And the resulting popular resistance, the policy of rapidly advancing "China" was frustrated, and finally it was decided to make a considerable degree of compromise to the local customs. The two cultural tendencies of "Hua Hua" and "local custom" had their own theoretical support. In the middle period, there appeared some eclectic theories with different emphases, which did not seem to repel the local vulgarity. In fact, what is advocated is a higher level of China.
【作者单位】: 南京大学法学院;
【基金】:国家社会科学基金重大项目《法律文明史》(批准号:11&ZD081) 南京大学“985”三期项目《社会转型与法制发展》
【分类号】:K312

【共引文献】

相关硕士学位论文 前5条

1 牟效萱;中韩传统家具的比较研究[D];南京林业大学;2005年

2 王鸿军;明代汉籍流入朝鲜李朝及其影响[D];内蒙古大学;2007年

3 兰阳;论元丽联姻及其对高丽的政治影响[D];延边大学;2007年

4 任君宇;明与王氏高丽的关系论述[D];辽宁大学;2007年

5 韩蕾蕾;明代陆地边疆治边方略的论争研究[D];西南大学;2008年



本文编号:1549383

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/xifanglishiwenhua/1549383.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户1c62c***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com