民族主义、现代性、东方主义、后殖民主义——晚近西方学术语境中的韩朝历史编纂学

发布时间：2018-03-18 08:38

本文选题：韩国　切入点：朝鲜　出处：《古代文明》2014年04期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：本文在回顾19世纪后期以降朝鲜早期民族主义史学与随后形成的殖民地史学,以及20世纪50至80年代两个朝鲜交织而又差异的民族主义历史编纂学概况基础上,通过梳理晚近时期英语学术语境中的韩朝历史编纂学研究状况,呈现韩朝历史编纂学重要观念和研究范式的推演流变。西方学术界的韩朝历史研究在50年代以后长期受现代性话语、西方中心主义、东方主义主导,80年代以后逐渐受后现代主义、后殖民主义、人类学研究方式等影响,出现历史修正思潮,与韩朝史学界自身以民族主义为中心的历史研究取向交错感染,辩难纠缠,形成非常复杂的学术状态。晚近韩国历史学家对西方的韩朝历史编纂学已经做出较有深度的评析。透过西方韩朝历史编纂学的推演历程,可以看到现实价值取向与历史客观性取向之间的复杂纠结。
[Abstract]:On the basis of reviewing the history of Korean nationalism in the late period of 19th century and the later colonial historiography, as well as the general situation of the two intertwined and different historical compilations of nationalism in Korea from 20th century to 80s, By combing the research status of Korean and Korean historiography in the English academic context of the late recent period, It presents the evolution of the important concepts and research paradigms of Korean and Korean historiography. Since 50s, the historical studies of Korea and North Korea in western academic circles have long been subject to modern discourse and Western centralism. After the 1980s, Orientalism was gradually influenced by post-modernism, post-colonialism, anthropology, and so on. The trend of historical revision appeared, and it interlaced with the historical research orientation centered on nationalism in the historical circles of Korea and North Korea. It is difficult to argue and entanglement, forming a very complicated academic state. Recently, Korean historians have made more in-depth comments on the western historical compilation of Korea and North Korea. Through the development of the western historical codification of Korea and North Korea, We can see the complex entanglement between realistic value orientation and historical objective sexual orientation.
【作者单位】：东北师范大学亚洲文明研究院;
【基金】：2012年度国家社科基金重大项目“当代国际史学研究及其发展趋势”(项目批号:12&ZD186)阶段性成果
【分类号】：K312

【共引文献】