苏联与朝鲜战争:以联合国为研究平台的考察

发布时间：2018-03-21 19:31

本文选题：苏联　切入点：美国　出处：《华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2013年06期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：战后初期,苏美矛盾的激化导致了联合国监督下的朝鲜选举只能在朝鲜南部举行,由此直接造成了朝鲜的分裂。朝鲜战争爆发后,由于苏联没有及时返回安理会,促使美国借用联合国的名义介入了朝鲜战争。志愿军入朝作战扭转战局以后,苏联拒绝了联合国的停火议案,错失了尽早实现朝鲜停战的一次机会。战争进入相持阶段后,苏美通过联合国渠道进行的沟通,推动了停战谈判大门的开启。战俘问题提交联合国以后,苏联始终坚持全部遣返的原则,致使联合国在战俘问题上无所作为。研究表明,苏美在联合国框架下关于朝鲜问题的博弈更多地表现为"零和",较少表现为"双赢"。这种大体上多为"零和"的博弈,对朝鲜战争的升级和朝鲜停战的实现产生了重要影响。
[Abstract]:In the early stage of the post-war period, the intensification of the contradiction between the Soviet Union and the United States led to the holding of elections under the supervision of the United Nations in the south of the country, which directly led to the division of the DPRK. After the outbreak of the Korean War, the Soviet Union did not return to the Security Council in time. Prompted the United States to intervene in the Korean War in the name of the United Nations. After the volunteers entered the Korean War to reverse the war situation, the Soviet Union rejected the United Nations ceasefire proposal and missed an opportunity to bring the Korean armistice to fruition as soon as possible. After the war entered a stalemate stage, The communication between the Soviet Union and the United States through the United Nations has promoted the opening of the door to the armistice negotiations. Since the issue of prisoners of war was submitted to the United Nations, the Soviet Union has always adhered to the principle of full repatriation, which has led the United Nations to do nothing on the issue of prisoners of war. Under the framework of the United Nations, the game between the Soviet Union and the United States on the Korean issue is more "zero sum" and less "win-win". This kind of game, which is mostly "zero sum", has had an important impact on the escalation of the Korean War and the realization of the Korean armistice.
【作者单位】：山西大学历史文化学院;
【基金】：教育部人文社科研究项目规划基金“隐于幕后:苏联与朝鲜战争关系研究”(10YJA770045 国家社会科学基金一般项目“中国与战后初期东亚国际体系的构建研究(1945—1955)”(13BZS048)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：K153

【相似文献】