北欧区域贸易研究相关学科路径述评

发布时间：2018-03-22 19:17

本文选题：北欧　切入点：区域贸易　出处：《商业研究》2017年01期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：19世纪政治经济学家搜集、整理史料的工作填补了传统贸易史研究的空白,但其在理论分析上的缺陷又招致经济学家批判。古典经济学派继而提出"自然禀赋理论"来解释交易行为的分工基础,新古典经济学派则将贸易模式的持续变革引向"要素积累与成本理论"。晚兴的制度经济学派发现贸易参与者制度建设方面的特殊效用后,试图通过"产权论"、"声誉机制"等理论重新阐释贸易行为。随着新史学兴起,史学家对经济学的建构范式也提出质疑,并提出比较文明及整体史观的研究路径。但是,在当前区域贸易研究中实现各学科路径的有效整合并非易事。或许只有坚持历史逻辑为前提,将定性分析与定量分析相结合,全面把握研究视角才能更深入理解贸易互动影响下的区域文明。
[Abstract]:The work of collecting and sorting out historical data by political economists in the 19th century filled the gap in the study of the history of traditional trade. However, its defects in theoretical analysis led to the criticism of economists. The classical school of economics then put forward "natural endowment theory" to explain the basis of division of labor of transaction behavior. The Neo-Classical School of Economics leads the continuous transformation of the trade model to the Theory of element accumulation and cost. After the late School of Institutional Economics discovered the special utility of trade participants in institutional construction, This paper attempts to reinterpret trade behavior through the theories of "property right theory", "reputation mechanism" and so on. With the rise of new historiography, historians also question the construction paradigm of economics, and put forward the research path of comparative civilization and overall historical view. It is not easy to realize the effective integration of various disciplines in the current research of regional trade. It is possible to combine qualitative analysis with quantitative analysis on the premise of historical logic. Only by comprehensively grasping the perspective of research can we better understand the regional civilization under the influence of trade interaction.
【作者单位】：中国人民大学历史学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金重大项目(第二批)多卷本《德国通史》子项目;项目编号:13&ZD104
【分类号】：K53;F749

【相似文献】