比较研究美国妇女选择权利派和生命权利派运动

发布时间：2018-04-09 23:39

本文选题：比较　切入点：研究　出处：《上海外国语大学》2007年硕士论文

【摘要】： 自从1973年1月22日美国最高法院“罗诉伟德案”裁决从法律上肯定了妊娠早期的堕胎,美国妇女就被分裂成了两大对立阵营。支持堕胎的一方为选择权利派而反对堕胎的一方则称作生命权利派。一场旷日持久的对抗性妇女运动也就此展开。本文在分别界定和阐明美国妇女运动的两个截然不同的派别“选择权利派”与“生命权利派”的产生极其社会意义后,对两者进行比较指出:由于堕胎权涉及妇女自身身份识别,以及某种根深蒂固的传统观念,才会引发上述这场对抗性的妇女运动。本文第一章剖析了堕胎权对于“选择权利派”妇女取得社会平等地位的意义。第二章主要分析美国妇女“生命权利派”运动的迅速发展极其背后的社会历史原因。在第三章中,本文将进一步挖掘两派的分歧,并揭示导致上述分歧的根本原因。
[Abstract]:American women have been divided into two opposing camps since the Supreme Court's Roe v. Wade ruling on January 22, 1973, which legally confirmed abortion in early pregnancy.The pro-abortion side chooses the right to choose, while the opposing side is called the right to life.A long-running, confrontational women's movement has also been launched.After defining and expounding the social significance of the "right of choice" and "the right to life", two distinct factions of the American women's movement, "the right to choose" and "the right to Life", are defined and expounded in this paper.It is pointed out by comparison that the right to abortion involves women's own identification and some deep-rooted traditional ideas, which will lead to this confrontational women's movement.The first chapter analyzes the significance of abortion right to women's social equality.The second chapter mainly analyzes the social and historical reasons behind the rapid development of American women's right to life movement.In the third chapter, this paper will further explore the differences between the two schools, and reveal the root causes of the differences.
【学位授予单位】：上海外国语大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2007
【分类号】：K712

【共引文献】