20世纪日本对外结盟研究

发布时间：2018-05-02 11:47

本文选题：20世纪 + 日本　；参考：《吉林大学》2006年博士论文

【摘要】： 日本在20世纪70%以上的时间内都处于同盟之中,日本与同盟者的结盟视野分别是地区性的和全球性的。日本的结盟轨迹是:与霸权国家结盟→与挑战霸权的国家结盟→与霸权国家结盟。日本结盟外交与国家战略的关系轨迹是:冲突→服务→冲突。日本的结盟对象恰恰是其将来或曾经所要针对的对象。日本长期处于国际体系和地缘的双重边缘位置,以及其国内的集团意识、自我约束意识、现实的相对主义意识、依赖心理、“忠”的观念、派系联盟认知和联盟政治经验,成为分析日本对外结盟的有益视角。结盟促使日本两度崛起,获得了长期的地区性优势。但是,结盟也刺激了国家间关系以及日本的一度衰落。日本长期对外结盟割裂了东亚的历史和认同,使区域化在东北亚、进而在东亚受阻,对区域安全与合作产生负面影响。结盟对于日本的崛起以及崛起的东亚构成严重挑战。
[Abstract]:Japan was in alliance for more than 70% of the time in the 20th century, and its vision of alliance with allies was regional and global. The path of Japan's alliance is: alliance with hegemonic countries and alliances with hegemonic countries. The relationship between Japan's alliance diplomacy and national strategy is as follows: conflict serves conflict. Japan's allies are precisely what they will or have been targeting. Japan has been on the edge of the international system and geography for a long time, as well as its internal consciousness of group, self-restraint, realistic relativism, dependence psychology, "loyalty", factional alliance cognition and alliance political experience. It has become a useful perspective for the analysis of Japan's alliance with foreign countries. The alliance prompted Japan to rise twice, gaining a long-term regional advantage. But alliances also spurred interstate relations and Japan's decline. Japan's long-term alliance with foreign countries severed the history and identity of East Asia, which made regionalization in Northeast Asia and then blocked in East Asia, which had a negative impact on regional security and cooperation. The alliance poses a serious challenge to Japan's rise and the rise of East Asia.
【学位授予单位】：吉林大学
【学位级别】：博士
【学位授予年份】：2006
【分类号】：K313

【引证文献】