“乙巳五条约”研究

发布时间：2018-05-11 09:03

本文选题：韩国 + 日本　；参考：《延边大学》2008年博士论文

【摘要】： 本论文拟以“乙巳五条约”为研究主题,来论述日本对韩国确立保护权,并说明该条约是日本明治维新以来的既定大陆政策的结果,也是日本强迫韩国皇帝和政府大臣签订的条约。按照时际法原则和传统国际法对“乙巳五条约”进行法律评价,认定该约是自始无效。论文共分七大部分,即由四个章节构成论文主体,还包括绪论、结论、文献资料。第一章主要把“征韩论”的出笼到“韩日协定书”的被迫缔结作为断限,论述日本“征韩论”的实施导致了中日甲午战争的爆发,进而阐明日俄战争就是甲午战争的继续。日本不顾韩国局外中立宣言,强占韩国全境,逐步确立对韩国的“顾问政治”体制。第二章以日本策划、缔结“乙巳五条约”的过程为主要内容,论述该约是在韩国大臣们被禁闭在会议厅内并受到肉体刑罚的威胁下签订的。《乙巳五条约》的签订,立即引起韩国广大人民的不满和强烈反对。第三章视“乙巳五条约”缔结到高宗皇帝被迫退位为断限,论述高宗皇帝不仅未曾裁可该约,而且直到其被迫退位前夕,不懈进行使该约无效化的密使外交斗争。光武帝绝对未曾投降于日本。也未曾主动屈服而玷污过神圣的国体。第四章以国际法理论评价“乙巳五条约”。不论是根据当时大韩帝国的国内法,还是适用“时际法”原则依照19、20世纪之交的国际法,可以说该约从未成立,而以此为基础的1910年《韩国并合条约》当然也无效。这样一来,日本在韩国的“殖民统治”将成为军事强占行为。因此,日方应对韩国36年间的非法占领行为进行赔偿并补偿自己的过失。本论文在充分吸收前人研究成果的基础上,在如下方面有所创意:一,研究100年前日本强占大韩帝国的过程,以明了日本对韩国确立保护权,是日俄战争前后出笼的“指导”、“保护”、“监理(control为支配之意)”三个侵略阶段之一的第二个阶段,其侵略目的为最终吞并韩国;二,早在1904年5、6月之交,日本内阁和天皇首次决定对韩国实行保护权或加以吞并的侵略计划;三,明确了“乙巳五条约”是强迫韩国皇帝和政府大臣签订的条约,而高宗皇帝则“从未允准”;四,按照当时的国际法和韩国国内法,“乙巳五条约”是不存在和自始无效的。
[Abstract]:This thesis intends to take the "five treaties of Yesi" as the research topic to discuss Japan's establishment of the right of protection over Korea, and to explain that the treaty is the result of Japan's established mainland policy since the Meiji Restoration. It was also a treaty that Japan forced the Korean emperor and the government minister to sign. According to the principle of intertemporal law and traditional international law, the legal evaluation of the five treaties of Yesi is held to be null and void from the beginning. The paper is divided into seven parts, which consists of four chapters, including introduction, conclusion and literature. In the first chapter, the forced conclusion of "Korea and Japan Agreement" is taken as a cut-off limit, and the implementation of Japanese "theory of Korean conscription" leads to the outbreak of Sino-Japanese Sino-Japanese Sino-Japanese War, and then clarifies that the Japanese-Russian War is the continuation of the Sino-Japanese War. In spite of the declaration of South Korea's neutrality, Japan gradually established a system of "advisory politics" to South Korea. The second chapter takes the process of Japan's planning and conclusion of the "five treaties of Yesi" as its main content, and discusses that the treaty was signed under the threat of physical punishment and the confinement of Korean ministers in the chamber. Immediately aroused the dissatisfaction and strong opposition of the broad masses of the Korean people. The third chapter regards the conclusion of the "five treaties of Yesi" to the forced abdication of the emperor Gaozong as a ruling limit, and discusses that the emperor of Gao Zong not only did not cut the treaty, but also unremittingly engaged in the diplomatic struggle of emissary to invalidate the treaty until the eve of his forced abdication. Emperor Guangwu never surrendered to Japan. Nor have they voluntarily succumbed to the sacredness of the state. The fourth chapter evaluates the five treaties of IBS on the basis of the theory of international law. Whether according to the domestic law of the Korean Empire at that time or the application of the principle of "intertemporal law" according to the international law at the turn of the 20th century, it can be said that the treaty has never been established, and the 1910 Treaty of Korean Unification based on it is of course null and void. In this way, Japan's "colonial rule" in South Korea will become a military occupation. So Japan should compensate South Korea for its 36-year illegal occupation and compensate for its negligence. On the basis of fully absorbing the previous research results, this paper has some ideas in the following aspects: first, the study of the process of Japan's forcible occupation of the Korean Empire 100 years ago makes it clear that Japan has established the right to protect Korea, which is the "guide" that emerged before and after the Japanese-Russian War. The second stage of one of the three stages of aggression aimed at the eventual annexation of Korea; second, as early as May, June 1904, The Japanese cabinet and the emperor decided for the first time to impose a plan of aggression to protect or annex Korea; third, it was made clear that the "five treaties" were treaties that forced the Korean emperor and government ministers to sign, while Emperor Gao Zong "never allowed it"; fourth, According to the international law of that time and the domestic law of Korea, the five treaties of Yesi did not exist and were null and void from the beginning.
【学位授予单位】：延边大学
【学位级别】：博士
【学位授予年份】：2008
【分类号】：K313.4;K312.4

【引证文献】