李廷龟庚申使明研究

发布时间：2018-05-23 09:47

本文选题：李廷龟 + 中朝关系　；参考：《陕西师范大学》2010年硕士论文

【摘要】： 本篇论文主要论述朝鲜大臣李廷龟庚申(1620年)使明事件,属于中朝关系史和前清史的范畴。核心人物是朝鲜重臣李廷龟。李廷龟在朝鲜历仕宣祖、光海君、仁祖三朝,由进士累迁至右议政,在朝鲜历史上是一个重要人物。其实在中朝关系史上,李廷龟也是一位重要人物,因为他一生四次出使明朝,首次辩丁应泰之诬,末次辩朝鲜私通后金事件,这都是对于中朝关系有重大影响的重要事件。论文围绕的核心事件是李廷龟庚申年出使明朝事件,详论出使的前因后果,以及此事件背后折射出的中朝关系的相关问题。本篇论文共分七章。第一章是绪论,介绍了中朝关系史的相关研究情况。前辈学者对中朝关系史论述甚多,研究已相当深入,但是主要是围绕在后金壮大前后以及萨尔浒之战前后朝鲜与后金、明关系的变化上。对李廷龟庚申使明事件少有人关注,因此围绕具体人物的具体外交事件就有了研究的必要。第二章论述李廷龟的生平和他的前三次使明事件。简要介绍了李廷龟的相关情况以及他的仕宦经历,重点论述了他的前三次使明经历：戊戌(1598年)辩诬之行；甲辰(1604年)奏请册封世子之行；丙辰(1616年)奏请冠服之行。第三章交代了明、朝鲜、后金三方关系,以作为李廷龟庚申出使的背景。介绍了女真隶属明朝的情况,对女真隶属朝鲜的情况做了考辩。论述了明朝与朝鲜相互的不信任以及明朝官员索贿对中朝关系造成的负面影响。在朝鲜与后金关系变化方面,特别是研究了萨尔浒之战中朝鲜军队的表现以及投降的原因,笔者不完全同意以往学者认为朝鲜军队在光海君授意之下投降的观点,认为投降的主要原因是朝鲜军队没有斗志,又极端缺乏军粮,对女真铁骑地极端恐惧之下而投降。第四章分析了李廷龟庚申出使的直接原因。一方面是明朝对朝鲜是否背叛的强烈怀疑,探讨了辽东流言的真实性。另一方面是明朝部分官员如徐光启、张至发、熊廷弼的主张对朝鲜造成了极大的压力。这些直接原因促使了李廷龟的辩诬之行。第五章陈述了李廷龟庚申使明的详细过程。首先谈了李廷龟出任辩诬使的过程,以及他在出使前的策略规划。然后论述了他出使的详细过程,包括拜见熊廷弼,给礼部、兵部呈文,以及数次拜见方从哲,最终获得昭雪皇敕的情况。最后论述了李廷龟参加神宗葬礼和光宗登基仪典的情况。第六章论述李廷龟出使事件的结果和影响。结果方面,李廷龟取得两道明帝敕书,明朝虽有一点诘责的意味,但是仍然承认了朝鲜的忠诚,预示了李廷龟辩诬任务的成功。影响方面,明朝的赏谕客观上对于光海君而言是一种默许和纵容,它导致了朝鲜私通后金地继续、光海君以后的事实上中立以及间接导致光海君被废。第七章是结论章。首先分析了李廷龟辩诬顺利成功的原因,第一是朝鲜对中朝关系的恶化程度估计过于严重,第二是明朝内部从皇帝到朝臣的欠缺责任心,对有益的辽东策略置之不理,第三是明朝的相关官员都收受了朝鲜的巨额贿赂。最后论述了光海君两端外交的客观效果,笔者认为皇太极的入侵与朝鲜两端外交的终止没有直接的因果关系,而和皇太极对于朝鲜一贯的强硬态度直接相关,因此皇太极当政后数月内即进攻朝鲜。
[Abstract]:This paper mainly discusses the event of the Korean Minister, Lee Ting turtles (1620), which belongs to the history of Sino Korean relations and the category of the former history of Qing Dynasty. The core figure is Li Tinggui Li Tinggui, the Korean heavy minister in the Korean calendar, Emperor Guang Hai, and the three dynasties of Ren Zu, which moved from the scholar to the right to the right to the government, and is an important figure in the history of the North Korea. On the other hand, Li Tinggui was also an important figure, because he made the Ming Dynasty four times in his life, the first to defend the falsely falsely, and the last time to defend the Korean private gold event. This was an important event which had a great influence on the relations between China and the DPRK. The core event around the paper was the incident of the Ming Dynasty, which was led by Li Ting, the former, the cause and the consequences of the envoy, and the incident. The problems related to the relationship between China and the DPRK reflected behind the back.
This paper is divided into seven chapters. The first chapter is the introduction, which introduces the related research on the history of Sino Korean relations. The predecessors and scholars have a lot of discussion on the history of Sino Korean relations, and the research has been quite deep, but it is mainly around the changes of the North Korea and the post gold, the Ming and Guan department before and after the war of the back gold, and the changes of the Ming and Guan department in Li Tinggui Geng Shen. People pay close attention to it, so it is necessary to study specific diplomatic events around specific figures.
The second chapter discusses the life of Li Tinggui and his first three events of Ming Dynasty. It briefly introduces Li Tinggui's related situation and his official experience, and focuses on his first three times: the reform movement of 1898 (1598).
The third chapter gives an account of the three party relations of Ming, DPRK, and later gold, as the background of the envoy of Li Ting turtles, introducing the situation of the Ming Dynasty and the situation of the Ming Dynasty. It also makes an examination of the situation of the women who belong to the DPRK. It discusses the mutual distrust between the Ming Dynasty and the DPRK and the negative influence of the officials of the Ming Dynasty on the Sino Korean customs. In particular, we studied the performance of the Korean army and the reasons for the surrender of the Korean army in the battle of the Sarhu. The author did not fully agree with the previous scholars that the Korean army had given the surrender of the Korean army under the grace of the king of Konghai. The main reason for the surrender was that the Korean army had no fighting and extreme lack of military grain. Drop.
The fourth chapter analyzes the direct cause of Li Tinggui's envoy. On the one hand, it is the strong suspicion of the North Korean betrayal in the Ming Dynasty and the authenticity of the Liaodong rumors. On the other hand, some officials of the Ming Dynasty, such as Xu Guangqi, Zhang Zhifa, and Xiong Tingbi, caused great pressure to the DPRK. These direct reasons prompted Li Tinggui to defend the false accusations. It's a trip.
The fifth chapter states the detailed process of Li Tinggui Geng Shen to make Ming. First, it talks about the process of Li Tinggui's appointment to defend and false accusations, as well as his strategy planning before his envoy, and then discusses the detailed process of his envoy, including the introduction of Xiong Tingbi, the gift department, the Military Ministry, and the final acquisition of the emperor Zhao Xue. Li Tinggui attended the funeral ceremony of emperor Shen and the ceremony of attending the throne.
The sixth chapter discusses the result and influence of Li Tinggui's envoy incident. As a result, Li Tinggui has made two imperial edict of Ming emperor, although there is a little accusations of the Ming Dynasty, but still acknowledges the loyalty of the DPRK, which indicates the success of Li Tinggui's false accusations. It led to the continuation of the Korean territory after the fornication, and in fact, the neutrality of Guang Hai Jun led to the disappearance of Guang Hai Jun.
The seventh chapter is the conclusion chapter. First, the reasons for the successful success of Li Tinggui's false accusations are analyzed. The first is that the deterioration of the relations between China and the DPRK is too serious. The second is the lack of responsibility in the Ming Dynasty from the emperor to the courtiers, ignoring the beneficial Liaodong strategy, and the third of the relevant officials of the Ming Dynasty received a huge bribe from the DPRK. Finally, the objective effect of the diplomacy between the two ends of the emperor was discussed. The author believes that there is no direct causal relationship between the invasion of the Royal Taiji and the termination of the diplomatic relations between the two sides of the DPRK, and it is directly related to the hard line attitude of the emperor to the DPRK.
【学位授予单位】：陕西师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2010
【分类号】：K312

【引证文献】