11-14世纪小亚细亚突厥化原因初探
发布时间:2018-05-30 18:33
本文选题:小亚细亚 + 拜占庭 ; 参考:《东北师范大学》2008年硕士论文
【摘要】: 小亚细亚半岛是拜占庭帝国的基本组成部分之一,对拜占庭帝国的财政、国防等曾经起到很大作用。公元11世纪起,随着拜占庭内部矛盾的加剧和突厥民族的兴起,双方在小亚地区爆发了冲突。随着拜占庭内部军区制的瓦解和中央、地方矛盾的激化,拜占庭的国力日趋衰落,小亚地区被突厥人逐渐占领。突厥人在小亚采取了一系列得当的占领、统治措施,使其在小亚的统治地位得到巩固,并使小亚逐渐被突厥化。 拜占庭与突厥在小亚的冲突,不仅是一个农业帝国同游牧民族的冲突,更是拜占庭为代表的东正教文明同新兴伊斯兰旗手的又一次碰撞,是小亚地区对不同文明类型的一次选择。小亚问题,对研究文明之间的关系,有一定的参考作用。本文试图通过拜占庭与突厥在小亚的冲突及结局来探究小亚被突厥人占领并逐步突厥化的原因。 全文由引言、正文、结论三大部分组成。引言部分包括文章的选题依据、国内外研究现状。 正文由四章组成:第一章介绍了小亚的主要状况;第二章介绍了突厥的兴起,并简要分析了突厥民族的特点;第三章论述了双方冲突与结果,简要分析了突厥人占领小亚的原因;第四章介绍分析了小亚的突厥化、小亚地区文明转型的原因。 结语部分是对全文的概括总结。通过对11--14世纪拜占庭与突厥在小亚的冲突分析不难发现:由于小亚自身的特点以及这4个世纪双方所处的不同发展阶段,小亚被突厥占领并被突厥化有着历史的必然性。
[Abstract]:Asia minor is one of the basic components of the Byzantine Empire, which once played a great role in the finance and defense of the Byzantine Empire. Since the 11th century AD, with the aggravation of the internal contradictions in Byzantium and the rise of the Turkic people, the two sides broke out conflicts in Xiaoya region. With the disintegration of Byzantine's internal military region system and the intensification of local contradictions, the power of Byzantium declined day by day, and Xiaoya area was gradually occupied by Turkic people. The Turkic people took a series of proper occupation and domination measures in Xiaoya, which consolidated their dominant position in Xiaoya and gradually made them Turkic. The conflict between Byzantium and Turkic in Little Asia was not only a conflict between an agricultural empire and a nomadic people, but also another collision between Byzantium's Eastern Orthodox civilization and the new Islamic flag bearer. It is a choice for different types of civilizations in Asia. Small sub-problem, for the study of the relationship between civilizations, has a certain reference. This paper attempts to explore the causes of the occupation and gradual Turkization of Byzantium and Turkic in Xiaoya through the conflict and the outcome of the conflict between Byzantium and Turkic. The full text consists of three parts: introduction, text and conclusion. The introduction part includes the selected topic basis of the article, the domestic and foreign research present situation. The text is composed of four chapters: the first chapter introduces the main situation of Xiaoya; the second chapter introduces the rise of Turkic and briefly analyzes the characteristics of the Turkic nationality; the third chapter discusses the conflicts and results of both sides. The fourth chapter introduces the reason of the Turkization and the transformation of the civilization in Xiaoya. The conclusion part is a summary of the full text. Based on the analysis of the conflict between Byzantium and Turkic in the 11th and 14th centuries in Xiaoya, it is not difficult to find that due to the characteristics of Xiaoya and the different stages of development of the two sides in these four centuries, it is inevitable that Xiaoya was occupied and Turkized by Turkic.
【学位授予单位】:东北师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2008
【分类号】:K134
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前9条
1 张绪山;6—7世纪拜占庭帝国与西突厥汗国的交往[J];世界历史;2002年01期
2 敬东;塞尔柱突厥与中亚[J];兰州教育学院学报;1995年01期
3 刘卓锋;突厥民族的伊斯兰化过程中波斯的作用[J];青海社会科学;2003年06期
4 徐家玲;论早期拜占庭的宗教争论问题[J];史学集刊;2000年03期
5 薛宗正;突厥可汗谱系新考[J];新疆大学学报(哲学社会科学版);1998年04期
6 阿米娜;试论罗姆苏丹国的建立对小亚细亚的影响[J];新疆师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);1999年02期
7 王治来;论中亚的突厥化与伊斯兰化[J];西域研究;1997年04期
8 魏良_";突厥汗国与中亚[J];西域研究;2005年03期
9 金朝光;突厥文化简述[J];昭乌达蒙族师专学报(汉文哲学社会科学版);1994年03期
,本文编号:1956341
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/xifanglishiwenhua/1956341.html
最近更新
教材专著