第四次十字军东征转向非偶然事件论辨

发布时间：2018-06-08 19:38

  本文选题：第四次十字军东征 + 偶然事件　； 参考：《江西社会科学》2012年06期

【摘要】：现存原始资料并不能证明第四次十字军东征的转向是偶然事件的结果。相关原始资料中,只有维尔阿杜安的《君士坦丁堡征服记》主张"偶然事件论",其余的或者主张阴谋论,或者反映了阴谋的存在,或者谴责威尼斯人。但维尔阿杜安的记载并不可靠,他写作的时候西方正在质疑第四次十字军东征的合法性,为了替自己和十字军首领们辩护,他写了回忆录,设法隐藏事实真相,把第四次十字军东征的转向解释成一系列偶然事件的结果。奎勒尔等现代学者依据维尔阿杜安的记载,辩护"偶然事件论",他们的观点也没有说服力。
[Abstract]:Existing sources do not prove that the fourth Crusade turn was the result of accidental events. Of the relevant sources, only Viladouan's Conquer of Constantinople advocates the "theory of accident", and the rest either advocates conspiracy theory, reflects the existence of a conspiracy, or condemns the Venetians. But Viadouan's account was unreliable, and he was writing at a time when the West was questioning the legitimacy of the fourth Crusade, and in order to defend himself and the leaders of the Crusades, he wrote his memoirs, trying to hide the truth. The turn of the fourth Crusade was interpreted as the result of a series of accidental events. Modern scholars, such as Quille, defended the "theory of accidental events" on the basis of Viadouan's records, and their arguments were not convincing.
【作者单位】： 中南大学马克思主义学院;
【分类号】：K503
，

本文编号：1996959