韩日间关于独岛（竹岛）领有权历史问题的研究现状分析

发布时间：2018-06-25 07:36

本文选题：独岛 + 独岛领有权　；参考：《延边大学》2009年硕士论文

【摘要】： 独岛领有权问题的实质是韩日间领土争端问题。现今韩国警备队实际支配着独岛,在日本国内则有一大部分学者主张独岛领有权应归属于日本,日本的大多数国民也认为日本的“竹岛领有权”迟早会得到恢复。在韩国国内“独岛领有权”问题也同样被受韩国国民所关注,对韩国人来说,独岛的主权问题不单单是领土之争,其中包含着国防军事战略发展的需要,还包含着海洋权益的争夺,更重要的是其背后贯穿着历史诠释权的斗争,以及朝鲜半岛民族的历史认同和自身认同的民族感情的体现。近年来,“独岛领有权问题”不断升温,已经成为影响韩日关系的焦点问题。目前韩国学界的主流观点认为,韩日间关于独岛领有权问题的论争始于1952年。1952年1月18日,韩国政府发表了《关于邻接海洋主权的总统宣言》(通称为“和平线宣布”或“李承晚领海线”),宣言中明确阐明了独岛是韩国固有领土,韩国对其拥有领有权。10天后,日本方面对此宣言表示抗议,同时否认宣言中关于韩国政府拥有独岛领有权的相关内容。韩日间关于独岛领有权的论争由此开始,并持续至今。一方面,韩国学界关于独岛领有权问题研究成果屡见不鲜,以“独岛研究保全协会”为代表的各学术团体举行各类学术研讨会,出版了大量关于独岛领有权的论文和著作。这些论文和著作大都从历史学、地理学、国际法学等角度探讨了“独岛领有权”问题。另一方面,日本学界关于独岛领有权的研究也从历史学、国际法等诸多角度对其进行了论述。本文的主要内容共分为以下四个方面: 第一,独岛的自然状况及拥有独岛主权的现实意义。第二,独岛领有权争端的由来及其演变过程。以“竹岛一件”、《岛根县告示》、《旧金山对日和平条约》等历史事件为主线,详细论述独岛领有权纠纷演变过程及其焦点问题。第三,韩国学界关于独岛领有权的主要观点及其主要历史事实依据。虽然目前韩国学界关于独岛领有权的研究已经取得了大量研究成果,并且有力地反驳了日本学者的反面主张,但很多细节还有待于进一步深层次地探讨,今后,韩国学者们在此问题的研究上仍然任重而道远。第四,日本学界关于独岛领有权的主要观点及其主要历史事实依据。日本学界的观点并非全然主张日本拥有独岛领有权,还有一少部分学者支持韩国学者的观点。韩日双方虽然各持己见,但韩国方面的论据充足,更有说服力。1996年《联合国海洋法公约》生效以后,两国围绕独岛领有权的纠纷实质上包含着海洋权益的争夺,因此,韩日两国今后在独岛纠纷问题上还将旷日持久地进行,并且关于有争议海域的摩擦可能增多。韩国政府及全体国民在独岛维权过程中有很多地方值得我们学习。
[Abstract]:The essence of Dokdo's sovereignty is the dispute between Korea and Japan. At present, the South Korean Police Force actually dominates Dokdo, while in Japan, a large proportion of scholars advocate that the right of Dokdo collar should belong to Japan, and most of the Japanese people also think that Japan's "Takesima right" will be restored sooner or later. In South Korea, the issue of "Dokdo sovereignty" has also been concerned by Korean nationals. To Koreans, the sovereignty issue of Dokdo is not only a territorial dispute, but also contains the need for the development of national defense and military strategy. It also includes the struggle for the rights and interests of the sea, the struggle for the right of historical interpretation behind it, and the reflection of the historical identity and the national feelings of the Korean Peninsula. In recent years, the issue of Dokdo's power has become the focus of Korean-Japanese relations. At present, the mainstream view of Korean academic circles is that the dispute between Korea and Japan on the right to claim Dokdo began in 1952. On January 18, 1952, The Korean Government issued the Presidential Declaration on the sovereignty of adjacent Seas (commonly referred to as the "declaration of the line of peace" or the "line of Li Seung-Man territorial waters"), in which it was made clear that Dokdo was an inherent territory of the Republic of Korea over which it was entitled for .10 days, Japan protested the declaration and denied any claims that the South Korean government has the right to Dokdo. South Korea and Japan on the sovereignty of Dokdo began to debate, and continue to this day. On the one hand, the Korean academic circles on the right of Dokdo territorial rights research results are common, "Dokdo Research and Conservation Association" as a representative of the various academic groups held various academic seminars, published a large number of papers and works on Dokdo right. Most of these papers and works discuss Dudao's right of law from the perspectives of history, geography and international law. On the other hand, the Japanese academic research on the right of Dokdo also discusses it from many angles, such as history, international law and so on. The main contents of this paper are divided into the following four aspects: first, the natural situation of Dudao and the practical significance of having Dudao sovereignty. Second, the origin and evolution of Dudao sovereignty dispute. Taking the historical events such as "one piece of Bamboo Island", "Islander County notice" and "Peace Treaty between San Francisco and Japan" as the main line, this paper discusses in detail the evolution process of Dudao's sovereignty dispute and its focal point. Third, the Korean academic circles about the Dokdo right of the main views and the main historical facts. Although the Korean academic circles have made a great deal of research achievements on the right of Dokdo, and have refuted the negative claim of Japanese scholars, but many details still need to be further discussed, and in the future, Korean scholars still have a long way to go to study this issue. Fourth, the Japanese academic circles about the Dokdo territorial right of the main views and the main historical facts. Japanese scholars do not entirely advocate that Japan has the right to Dokdo, and a small number of scholars support the view of Korean scholars. Although the ROK and Japan hold their own views, the South Korean side has ample arguments and is more persuasive. After the entry into force of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea in 1996, the dispute between the two countries over the sovereignty of Dokdo essentially involves a struggle for maritime rights and interests. South Korea and Japan will continue to work on the Dokdo dispute for a long time in the future, and friction over disputed waters is likely to increase. South Korean government and all citizens in the process of Dokdo rights there are many places to learn.
【学位授予单位】：延边大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2009
【分类号】：K3

【引证文献】