当前位置:主页 > 社科论文 > 世界历史论文 >

试论苏南冲突的界标-1948年苏南保三党莫斯科会议

发布时间:2018-07-08 17:24

  本文选题:苏南冲突 + 莫斯科三党会议 ; 参考:《曲阜师范大学》2012年硕士论文


【摘要】:苏南冲突是20世纪国际关系中的重要事件之一。第二次世界大战后,在苏联的推动下,社会主义制度从苏联走出国门,由一国变成了多国,在东欧建立了一系列的社会主义政权。冷战爆发后,这些社会主义国家形成了一个铁桶一般的阵营,与以美国为首的资本主义国家进行抗衡。然而,铁板一块的共产主义同盟并没有维持多久,1948年曾被认为是苏联最忠诚的盟友南斯拉夫与苏联发生了激烈的冲突,这也就证明了铁板一块的共产主义同盟只不过是一种神话。 苏南冲突是当时国际共产主义运动的第一次分裂,它对整个国际共产主义运动来说是一个悲剧。以往学者在研究苏南冲突时,基本上仅仅局限于在当代国际共产主义运动的框架内研究和分析苏南冲突,而本文认为,苏南冲突与冷战有着密切的联系,应该把苏南冲突放在东西方冷战的格局下进行研究。这主要是因为,其一,苏南爆发冲突的一个重要因素是双方在如何应对西方冷战政策问题上出现了分歧,其二,苏南冲突也正好发生在冷战对峙最为尖锐的时期。本文试图通过借助俄罗斯及东欧国家在冷战后解密公布的部分历史档案资料,从国际关系的角度探讨苏南冲突的起点,即1948年苏、南、保三党莫斯科会议,围绕着这一会议召开前后的相关问题,通过论证,探析苏南冲突的根本原因。 在写作过程中,本文共分为三个大部分:第一部分论述了1948年苏南保三党莫斯科会议召开的历史背景。在这一部分中主要论述了两方面的内容,第一,从南斯拉夫在战后选择社会主义制度,实行“一边倒”的外交政策、与苏联站在同一阵营共同应对马歇尔计划以及苏南共同筹备建立共产党情报局等历史事件,论述了苏南两国在战后初期相互之间的亲密关系,从而得出直到1948年初,南斯拉夫一直都是苏联最忠实的盟友和追随者。第二,通过论述苏南两国在的里雅斯特的归属问题、经济关系问题、建立巴尔干联邦问题以及在社会政治生活中的一系列问题上的摩擦,得出两国在表面的亲密友好关系之下实际上早已龌龊丛生,这也预示了一场大的冲突的爆发。第二部分论述了苏南在党莫斯科会议上斗争的主要议题,同时也是苏南两党、两国斗争的焦点。通过论述苏南在南保关系问题、南阿关系问题、希腊内战问题上的不可调和的矛盾,揭示出苏南冲突爆发的必然性。同时也正是这次会谈,成为苏南两党、两国从友好合作走向全面、公开对抗的分水岭。第三部分作为文章的结束部分,主要论述了苏南爆发冲突的根本原因。苏南双方在意识形态方面的论战只是苏南冲突的外在表现形式,其深层次的原因则是由于国际形势的变化,双方在对外战略上产生了矛盾和对抗。这种矛盾和对抗又主要表现在双方对巴尔干地区的争夺,即南斯拉夫试图在苏联范围内建立一个巴尔干联邦的计划与苏联的东欧一体化方案发生了碰撞,,这种激烈的碰撞,就使得苏南之间冲突的爆发再所难免了。
[Abstract]:The conflict in South of Jiangsu was one of the most important events in international relations in twentieth Century. After the Second World War, under the impetus of the Soviet Union, the socialist system came out of the Soviet Union from the Soviet Union and became a multinational country and established a series of socialist regimes in Eastern Europe. After the outbreak of the cold war, these socialist countries formed a general camp, Against the capitalist countries headed by the United States, however, the iron plate of the Communist alliance did not last long, and in 1948, the most loyal ally of the Soviet Union, Yugoslavia, had been clash with the Soviet Union, which proved that the iron alliance was only a myth.
The South of Jiangsu conflict is the first division of the international communist movement at that time. It is a tragedy for the entire international communist movement. In the past, scholars in the past were only confined to the study and analysis of the South of Jiangsu conflict in the framework of the contemporary international communism movement, and this article holds that the conflict between South of Jiangsu and the cold war is in South of Jiangsu. Closely linked, the South of Jiangsu conflict should be studied under the cold war situation between the East and the West. This is mainly because one of the important factors for the outbreak of the conflict in South of Jiangsu is the differences between the two sides on how to deal with the western cold war policy, and the second, the South of Jiangsu conflict happened in the most acute period of the Cold War confrontation. Through the use of Russian and Eastern European countries to decrypt some of the historical records published after the cold war, the starting point of the South of Jiangsu conflict is discussed from the perspective of international relations, namely, the 1948 Soviet, South, and the three party Moscow Conference, around the related issues before and after the meeting, and the fundamental reasons for the conflict in South of Jiangsu.
In the process of writing, this article is divided into three parts: the first part deals with the historical background of the convening of the Moscow Conference of the three party of South of Jiangsu Bao in 1948. In this part, it mainly discusses the content of two aspects. First, from the post-war Yugoslavia, the socialist system was selected and the "one-sided" foreign policy was carried out, and the same as the Soviet Union. The camps jointly responded to the Marshall plan and South of Jiangsu's joint preparations for the establishment of the Communist Party intelligence service and other historical events, and discussed the close relationship between South of Jiangsu and the two countries in the early postwar period. Thus, until the beginning of 1948, Yugoslavia had always been the most loyal ally and followers of the Soviet Union. Second, through the discussion of the South of Jiangsu two countries in Li Ya. The problem of attribution, economic relations, the establishment of the Balkan federal problem and a series of frictions in the social and political life have come to the conclusion that the two countries have long been filthy under the intimate and friendly relations of the two countries, which also foreshadows a big conflict. The second part deals with the struggle of South of Jiangsu in the party Moscow Conference. The main issue of the dispute is also the focus of the two parties and the struggle between the two parties in South of Jiangsu. Through the discussion of the irreconcilable contradiction between the South Arab relations, the South Arab relations and the Greek civil war, the inevitability of the outbreak of the South of Jiangsu conflict is revealed by South of Jiangsu. It is also the meeting of the two parties in South of Jiangsu, and the two countries move from friendly cooperation to a comprehensive and open country. The third part, as the end of the article, mainly discusses the fundamental causes of the outbreak of the conflict in South of Jiangsu. The ideological debate between the two sides of South of Jiangsu is only the external manifestation of the conflict in South of Jiangsu, and its deep level is due to the changes in the international situation and the contradiction and confrontation between the two sides in the foreign strategy. The contradiction and confrontation are mainly reflected in the contention between the two sides in the Balkans. That is, the attempt of Yugoslavia to establish a Balkan Union in the Soviet Union and the Soviet Union's Eastern European integration program collide, which makes the explosion of the conflict between South of Jiangsu unavoidable.
【学位授予单位】:曲阜师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:K153

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 沈志华;;“铁托道路”是怎么形成的?——一九四八年苏南冲突始末[J];百年潮;1999年10期

2 张盛发;1948-1949年苏南冲突原因新探[J];当代世界社会主义问题;2000年01期

3 沈志华,张盛发;从大国合作到集团对抗──论战后斯大林对外政策的转变(根据俄国档案的新材料)[J];东欧中亚研究;1996年06期

4 郝承敦;论冷战初期苏南在东欧地区的战略分歧[J];国际论坛;1999年04期

5 郝承敦;;论苏南冲突中的希腊因素[J];华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2006年03期

6 金重远;阿尔巴尼亚和苏南、苏中冲突[J];历史教学问题;2000年02期

7 沈志华;1948年苏南冲突起因的历史考察——来自俄国及东欧国家解密档案的新证据[J];历史研究;1999年04期

8 金重远;马克思主义?民族主义?──1948年苏南冲突的再审视[J];史林;2000年01期

9 郝承敦,方建新;论苏南冲突的根本原因[J];兰州学刊;2004年06期

10 郝承敦;;论20世纪40年代末期南阿交恶的缘由[J];齐鲁学刊;2008年06期



本文编号:2108168

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/xifanglishiwenhua/2108168.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户b4645***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com