理论与方法的推陈出新——新文化史研究综述
发布时间：2018-08-08 10:47
【摘要】：文化的时代性是古典文化史的考察重点。古典文化史注重精英文化而无视普通人的生活,强贴时代标签而忽略文化的多样性。新文化史扭转了这一局面。它顺应二战后人文社科领域"文化转向"的趋势,吸收了"自下而上"的社会史研究思想,借鉴人类学等其他学科成果,形成独特的研究范式——以文化及其意义为对象,开展跨学科研究,以讲故事的方式从事微观考察,从而拓展了史学研究领域,在欧美国家掀起了一场史学理论与方法的革新运动。然而新文化史也存在弊端,如探讨对象的不明晰、研究取向的碎片化、客观历史的否定性,遇到了发展的瓶颈。另外,新文化史传入中国后,与社会史相结合,被称为社会文化史,仍有待于深入挖掘。
[Abstract]:The epochal nature of culture is the focus of classical cultural history. The history of classical culture pays attention to elite culture and ignores the life of ordinary people. The new cultural history has reversed the situation. It follows the trend of "cultural turn" in the field of humanities and social sciences after World War II, absorbs the "bottom-up" social history research thought, draws lessons from the achievements of other disciplines such as anthropology, and forms a unique research paradigm-taking culture and its significance as its object. By carrying out interdisciplinary research and conducting microcosmic investigation in the way of storytelling, the field of historical research has been expanded, and a revolutionary movement of historical theory and method has been launched in Europe and the United States. However, there are some disadvantages in the new cultural history, such as the unclear object of discussion, the fragmentation of research orientation and the negativity of objective history, which meet the bottleneck of development. In addition, after the introduction of new cultural history into China, the combination of social history and social history is called social cultural history, which still needs to be further explored.
【作者单位】： 浙江水利水电学院;
【分类号】：K103
本文编号：2171547
[Abstract]:The epochal nature of culture is the focus of classical cultural history. The history of classical culture pays attention to elite culture and ignores the life of ordinary people. The new cultural history has reversed the situation. It follows the trend of "cultural turn" in the field of humanities and social sciences after World War II, absorbs the "bottom-up" social history research thought, draws lessons from the achievements of other disciplines such as anthropology, and forms a unique research paradigm-taking culture and its significance as its object. By carrying out interdisciplinary research and conducting microcosmic investigation in the way of storytelling, the field of historical research has been expanded, and a revolutionary movement of historical theory and method has been launched in Europe and the United States. However, there are some disadvantages in the new cultural history, such as the unclear object of discussion, the fragmentation of research orientation and the negativity of objective history, which meet the bottleneck of development. In addition, after the introduction of new cultural history into China, the combination of social history and social history is called social cultural history, which still needs to be further explored.
【作者单位】： 浙江水利水电学院;
【分类号】：K103
【相似文献】
中国期刊全文数据库 前10条
1 鲍良骏;从某些历史文化现象看文化史研究[J];世界历史;1986年10期
2 禾隹;世界地区文化史研究的新突破——《东南亚文化发展史》评介[J];世界历史;1996年05期
3 宋瑞芝;西方文化史研究述评[J];江汉论坛;1994年10期
4 赵秋长,任石径;对俄罗斯文化史研究的思考[J];河北师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);1999年03期
5 贺圣达;东南亚文化史研究三题[J];云南社会科学;1996年03期
6 毛锐;一部面向21世纪的文化史力作——评裔昭印主编的《世界文化史》[J];历史教学问题;2001年05期
7 周春生;西方文艺复兴史三大研究热点述评[J];史学理论研究;2003年01期
8 熊芳芳;历史人类学研究的经典之作——读《都铎和斯图亚特时期英国的巫术》[J];史学理论研究;2003年04期
9 胡向军;评《1500年以来英国社会的妇女和老年化》[J];世界历史;2004年02期
10 刘广太;世界历史研究的可喜成果——《世界文化史纲》评介[J];衡水师专学报;2002年03期
中国硕士学位论文全文数据库 前3条
1 孙柯君;19世纪初的英国大众读者研究[D];上海师范大学;2013年
2 冀强;赛里斯：一个称谓的文化史[D];南京大学;2011年
3 高楠;超越文化转向—林亨特《法国大革命时期的家庭罗曼史》研究[D];黑龙江大学;2011年
，本文编号：2171547
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/xifanglishiwenhua/2171547.html
最近更新
教材专著
