20世纪40年代以来缅甸罗兴伽人问题研究

发布时间：2018-08-11 18:13

【摘要】：2008年以来,缅甸罗兴伽人问题被网络和媒体推到了风口浪尖,人们才惊讶的发现,在这个信息高度发达的时代,罗兴伽人的资料多么匮乏和混乱。本文研究的主体“罗兴伽人问题”是一个统称,代指所有与主体民族生活在缅甸若开邦,被称为“Rohingya”的族群有关的问题。“罗兴伽人”在各国人口的总和最多不超过400万,是一个比较小的族群,但是这个小族群却引起了全世界的瞩目。关于该族群,几乎一切说法都未能在国际社会达成共识,“所有观点都有争议”是罗兴伽人问题研究的最大的魅力所在,尽力理清这个族群的历史,给这个族群一个准确的定位,是笔者的初心。目前,国内外对罗兴伽人问题的讨论主要集中在两个部分:一是二战之前有关罗兴伽人产生和发展的历史研究;二是2008年罗兴伽难民事件发生之后的事件叙述及引申研究。笔者经过研究后发现,学术界对罗兴伽人问题讨论的时间段划分是有待商榷的。罗兴伽人问题的缘起、发展、转变过程恰恰是在20世纪40年代到2008年之间完成的,对这一阶段历史探讨的缺失导是致罗兴伽人问题难以达成共识的主要原因之一。因此本文围绕着这一时间段进行重点的研究和讨论,力求达到以下突破:第一,准确地定义研究的概念。目前国内外研究对罗兴伽人问题的很多概念并没有达成共识,没有准确的概念支撑,罗兴伽人问题就无法继续讨论,更谈不上如何解决。第二,科学地划分研究的时间段。即对目前罗兴伽人历史追溯的时间进行更正,本文认为对罗兴伽人历史探讨的时间应该是从20世纪40年代开始的,而非主流的7至8世纪或15世纪两种观点。第三,详细地补充研究的资料。对国内文章中20世纪40年代以来至2008年之间历史资料进行补充,用筛选和考据的方法引用更多的历史资料,以弥补缅甸军政府相对封闭的政策以及西方媒体带有倾向性的报道所带来的资料短缺。第四,创新地运用研究的视角。本文从倾向于缅甸政府和罗兴伽人这两个对立的视角切入,以史学理论和考据法为主要的方法论,同时结合多交叉学科的理论进行分析,研究尽力不人云亦云,力求对20世纪40年代以来罗兴伽人历史叙述的全面性和真实性。
[Abstract]:Since 2008, when the issue of Luo Xing in Myanmar has been brought to the fore by the Internet and the media, people have been surprised to discover how scarce and chaotic the information of the Luo Xing is in this age of highly developed information. The subject of this paper is the Luo Xing problem, which refers to all the problems related to the ethnic groups living in Rakhine State, Myanmar, known as "Rohingya". The "Luo Xing" population of no more than 4 million people in the world is a relatively small group, but this small group has attracted the attention of the world. Almost everything about this group has failed to reach a consensus in the international community. "all views are disputed" is the greatest charm of the Luo Xing study, trying to sort out the history of the group. To give this group an accurate positioning, is the initial heart of the author. At present, the discussion on the issue of Luo Xing people at home and abroad is mainly focused on two parts: first, the historical study on the emergence and development of Luo Xing before World War II; second, the narration and extension of the events after the occurrence of the refugee incident in Luo Xing in 2008. The author finds that the division of the time period of the discussion of the Luo Xing question in academic circles is open to question. The origin, development and transformation of the Luo Xing problem were completed between 1940s and 2008. The lack of guidance in this period is one of the main reasons why it is difficult to reach a consensus on the problem of Luo Xing people. Therefore, this paper focuses on the research and discussion of this period, and tries to achieve the following breakthroughs: first, define the concept of research accurately. At present, there is no consensus on many concepts of the Luo Xing problem at home and abroad, and without accurate conceptual support, there is no way to continue to discuss the Luo Xing problem, let alone how to solve it. Second, divide the time period of research scientifically. That is, to correct the time of tracing back to the history of Luo Xing, this paper holds that the time of discussing the history of Luo Xing should be from 1940s to 1940s, rather than from the mainstream views of 7 to 8 century or 15 century. Third, to supplement the research data in detail. To supplement the historical data from 1940s to 2008 in domestic articles, and to use the method of screening and textual research to quote more historical data. To make up for the military junta's relatively closed policy and Western media with biased reports caused by the lack of information. Fourth, innovative use of the perspective of research. From the angle of view which inclines to the Myanmar government and the Luo Xing people, this paper takes the historical theory and textual research method as the main methodology, at the same time carries on the analysis with the multi-disciplinary theory, studies the best not to follow the others. To strive for the history of the Luo Xing since the 1940s and the authenticity of the narrative.
【学位授予单位】：云南师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：K337.8

【参考文献】