两次世界大战之间美国的军事思想
[Abstract]:The 20 years between World War I and World War II was a turbulent period in the modern history of the world. The unprecedented economic crisis, like an earthquake, rocked the economies of capitalist countries. The contradictions among the imperialist countries have become more intense than ever. In order to get rid of the influence of economic crisis, the big countries rearmament, trying to find a way out through war. The birth of the fascist freak enveloped the whole world with the cloud of a new world war. The grim situation has deeply influenced the development of American military thought. During World War I, the United States took on a superpower posture politically, militarily and economically. However, in the process of the Paris Peace Conference and the establishment of the League of Nations, the United States failed to gain control of world political affairs because of the resistance of Britain and France, and its attempt to be a world hegemon was thwarted. In order to maintain self-esteem, the United States began to pursue a "isolationist" foreign policy, but did not give up its ambition to seize world hegemony. Under the increasingly tense international situation in the 1930s, the United States stepped up its armament construction and made preparations for a new world war. In the turbulent period, the military strategic thought of the United States has undergone a fundamental change, from a simple military strategy to a comprehensive overall strategy in the political, diplomatic, military and economic fields. After World War I, the US military set three main strategic objectives: first, to protect the United States mainland and overseas territories from encroachment; second, to prevent Europe from getting involved in the Western Hemisphere; and third, to maintain China's sovereignty and territorial integrity. The change of American military strategy also affected the military thought of the United States. The end of the first World War did not put an end to the competition among the great powers, but also increased the strong hatred and vengeance of the defeated countries towards the victors, and the impact of the world economic crisis, which led to the emergence of fascism between Germany, Italy and Japan. A new war is brewing. All countries are preparing for war. In addition, the rapid development of science and technology in the world after World War I also reflected the tremendous growth in the military field, aircraft, tanks, new ships and artillery, and various weapons and equipment. The new situation mentioned above and the severe international situation have greatly affected American military thinking. In the "eventful autumn" between the two world wars, under the dual influence of domestic unrest and international vicissitudes, American military thought developed greatly and made great achievements in adapting to the new situation. The main manifestation is: the military strategic thought of the United States changes to the omni-directional global strategy, and the global strategy has its initial frame. During this period, the United States combined political and diplomatic means, established a consolidated strategic rear, won over allies and served the realization of global strategic objectives. As a result of the formulation of the right strategy. So the United States is strategically prepared for a new world war. When the war broke out, the United States quickly entered the war, and finally won the war. Under the guidance of correct strategic thinking, the United States successfully utilized the international disarmament movement to weaken the naval power of the great powers, and made the United States navy take the first place in the world and gained the naval superiority over the great powers. At the same time, under the guidance of Mitchell's "Air Force first" ideology, the United States Air Force quickly rose to prominence. In addition, the United States also adopted the policy of active combat readiness, formulated the policy and plan of general mobilization of the country, and carried out universal military training for civilians. These are all ready for the coming world war.
【学位授予单位】:山东师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2010
【分类号】:E097.12;K712
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 王莉;美法两国违宪审查制度之比较[J];安徽广播电视大学学报;2005年02期
2 程乃胜;美国宪法与美国宗教信仰自由[J];安徽师范大学学报(人文社会科学版);2000年01期
3 李妍;;论新教之于美国社会的重要作用[J];安徽文学(下半月);2008年02期
4 张福财;试论战后美欧关系发展演变及欧洲联合一体化问题[J];北方论丛;2002年01期
5 王妍;试析罗斯福时期美国对日本侵华的政策[J];北方论丛;2002年02期
6 郭立珍;;20世纪初期美国消费文化转型考察[J];北方论丛;2010年01期
7 白晓东;美国移民法与华人社会关系初探[J];八桂侨史;1995年01期
8 李洪欣;评美国总统任期制[J];比较法研究;1989年02期
9 石柏林;彭澎;;宪政理念与宪法命运:中美第一部宪法比较分析[J];比较法研究;2006年02期
10 许国林;20世纪20年代美国社会经济问题分析[J];北京工商大学学报(社会科学版);2004年01期
相关会议论文 前8条
1 周均;;从“三横”到“一条”:冷战后美国全球战略的基本目标[A];2007年江苏省哲学社会科学界学术大会论文集(下)[C];2007年
2 徐勇;;论孙中山政军关系理论的内涵及其政治贡献[A];“孙中山北伐与梧州”学术研讨会论文集[C];1999年
3 董建萍;;三大规律视角下的社会公正问题——共产党执政能力建设的重要方面[A];中国科学社会主义学会当代世界社会主义专业委员会年会暨“共产党执政的历史经验和教训”学术研讨会文集[C];2005年
4 盖玉彪;;巴以暴力恐怖冲突原因分析[A];中国犯罪学研究会第三届会员代表会议——暨第十一届学术研讨会会议论文[C];2002年
5 王刚;;早期美国宪法的历史演进与动因分析[A];当代法学论坛(2006年第3辑)[C];2006年
6 周伟文;;两种宪法保障制度比较[A];外国法制史论文集(《外国法制史汇刊》第二、三合集)[C];1990年
7 张锐智;;试论美国司法审查制在权力监督中的作用[A];全国外国法制史研究会学术丛书——20世纪外国司法制度的变革[C];2002年
8 叶长良;倪健民;;略论罗斯福的“新政”立法[A];外国法制史汇刊第一集[C];1984年
相关博士学位论文 前10条
1 邓继好;程序正义理论在西方的历史演进[D];华东政法大学;2010年
2 郭延军;发展中的美国女性就业权平等保护[D];华东政法大学;2010年
3 王永昌;中美军民关系比较研究:近30年视距的考察[D];国防科学技术大学;2010年
4 李家成;冷战后美国东亚战略:底线、挑战与应策,1989-2009[D];吉林大学;2011年
5 王晓军;冷战后俄罗斯军事战略研究[D];吉林大学;2011年
6 戚尔达;保罗·尼采与杜鲁门时代美国国家安全战略的制订[D];复旦大学;2011年
7 潜旭明;美国的国际能源战略研究[D];复旦大学;2010年
8 胡文秀;论冷战后国内武装冲突和平解决的影响因素[D];中国社会科学院研究生院;2011年
9 罗昌财;中国政府预算民主化改革研究[D];西南财经大学;2010年
10 任方;美国在朝鲜战争中的军事战略决策[D];东北师范大学;2011年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 陈帅;从门罗主义到门户开放[D];辽宁师范大学;2010年
2 尤维丽;美国二十世纪五六十年代黑人投票权的实现[D];华东政法大学;2010年
3 韩睿;西方发达国家弹劾制研究[D];辽宁师范大学;2010年
4 姚华妹;论美国国际贸易法院的司法审查及借鉴[D];湘潭大学;2010年
5 康小蕊;宏观调控行为可诉性问题研究[D];江西财经大学;2010年
6 黄永庆;美国宪政史上黑人民权的演变[D];江西师范大学;2010年
7 刘晓华;“建国时期”美国的军事改革和建设[D];山东师范大学;2010年
8 梁筱娴;保释制度研究[D];西南政法大学;2010年
9 袁荔芳;亨利·克莱与西属美洲独立运动(1815-1822)[D];福建师范大学;2010年
10 王艳;安德鲁·约翰逊南方重建探微[D];山东师范大学;2011年
,本文编号:2370083
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/xifanglishiwenhua/2370083.html