应对戴高乐主义:美国对法政策研究(1958-1968)
[Abstract]:In June 1958, de Gaulle took charge of France for the second time, pursuing Gaullism's foreign policy and challenging American hegemony. In the face of the challenge of de Gaullism, this paper mainly examines the decision-making process, policy implementation and effect of the United States. From June to July 1958, Charles de Gaulle issued a de Gaullism diplomatic declaration to Britain and the United States one after another. While the United States welcomed de Gaulle to power, it did not welcome it. From 1958 to 1960, de Gaulle proposed a "September Memorandum" to restructure NATO. The Mediterranean Fleet, which is part of NATO, was withdrawn and the first successful nuclear test was conducted. While the Eisenhower administration agreed to the trilateral talks, it rejected the fundamental principles of de Gaullism. During the Kennedy administration, the contradiction between the United States and France became more open, which was embodied in the differences of European strategy between the two sides. Kennedy wants grand plans, de Gaulle wants greatness, and two different European strategies inevitably collide. Kennedy was more aggressive than his predecessor in dealing with de Gaullism and ended up losing both. The grand plan was not completed, and the construction of Europe in de Gaullism was thwarted. After Johnson succeeded the presidency, Charles de Gaulle first recognized the new China in January 1964, then in March 1966 proposed to withdraw completely from NATO military integration, the contradiction between the United States and France reached its climax. In the face of these challenges from Charles de Gaulle, Johnson adopted a cautious policy. As a result, the United States contained the impact of the establishment of diplomatic relations between China and France, strengthened NATO, and succeeded in keeping France in the alliance. Through a thorough discussion of some important issues and a comprehensive perspective on the relationship between the United States and France during the Charles de Gaulle period, we can find that although the United States and France have been in constant contradiction, they still maintain an alliance relationship. The United States and France maintain the alliance with both interests and ideological factors. The turbulent alliance is the basic characteristic of American-French relations. America's policy toward de Gaullism was basically successful. The United States maintained its hegemony in the West, strengthened NATO, prevented proliferation to Germany and weakened the influence of de Gaullism. De Gaullism, however, did not achieve great success. It achieved independence, not greatness.
【学位授予单位】:首都师范大学
【学位级别】:博士
【学位授予年份】:2008
【分类号】:K712.54
【相似文献】
相关会议论文 前1条
1 阿兰·巴迪乌;罗久;;共产主义假设[A];当代国外马克思主义评论(8)[C];2010年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 本报驻华盛顿特约记者李正信;美法关系究竟会向何处去[N];中华工商时报;2003年
2 本报驻法国记者 张祝基;更加现实的戴高乐主义[N];人民日报;2002年
3 许振洲;法国反美象征着戴高乐主义的某种回归[N];中国经营报;2003年
4 周荣耀;没有戴高乐的戴高乐主义[N];中国社会科学院院报;2004年
5 新华社记者 谭卫兵;美法关系:缓和与龃龉交织[N];新华每日电讯;2003年
6 本报驻法国记者 张祝基;法美关系新波澜[N];人民日报;2003年
7 宗文;交好俄德孤立法国 美国重建欧美框架[N];经理日报;2003年
8 李海东;美国或土耳其:谁是“北约之痒”?[N];中国经营报;2003年
9 本报驻巴黎记者 何农;法国和美国为什么失和[N];光明日报;2003年
10 本报驻法国记者 张祝基;法美关系 龃龉与缓和交织[N];人民日报;2002年
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 姚百慧;应对戴高乐主义:美国对法政策研究(1958-1968)[D];首都师范大学;2008年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 葛栗;萨科奇,戴高乐主义的信徒还是叛徒?[D];外交学院;2010年
2 赵茗;戴高乐外交思想与实践的民族主义传统[D];青岛大学;2005年
3 赵雪媛;[D];西安外国语大学;2011年
4 张猛;试论戴高乐主义[D];湘潭大学;2005年
5 武进;独立外交与大国地位[D];华东师范大学;2006年
6 蔺志同;戴高乐欧洲联合思想对法国欧洲政策的影响[D];中国政法大学;2009年
7 苗娟;罗曼·加里:在希望与绝望之间[D];首都师范大学;2007年
8 尹明明;戴高乐的外交政策[D];外交学院;2001年
9 郭润春;萨科奇执政以来的中法关系研究[D];新疆大学;2010年
10 张钰;宪法修改创议程序比较研究[D];湘潭大学;2011年
,本文编号:2405643
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/xifanglishiwenhua/2405643.html