海外印度人与海外华人之比较研究——新加坡个案分析
发布时间：2019-06-16 18:06
【摘要】： 海外华人与海外印度人作为世界上两支人口数目巨大的移民群体,无疑是全球移民史上一大壮举。同时,这两只移民族群又分别与中国、印度两国有着紧密地联系,有不同的地方,更有较大的相似性,因而具有可比性。本论文在对海外印度人与海外华人移民新加坡的历史和现状等基本情况进行分析的基础上,对两者进行移民原因、经济实力、文化教育、宗教信仰、择偶模式、竞争力以及中印两国的移民(侨民)政策等方面作比较研究,选用了英文原著和印度外交部官方网站上的报告等原始资料,也参考了前人的研究成果。 本文的行文结构安排如下:第一章为绪论,交代选题缘由、本文涉及的几个基本概念、当前的研究现状以及本论文研究方法和研究目的意义;第二章介绍海外印度人与海外华人的基本概况,新加坡简介,主要介绍两支移民群体在东南亚以及新加坡的分布情况与现状;第三章是本文的重点,主要是新加坡的印度人与华人之间的比较研究,涉及经济实力、职业与社会地位、文化教育、宗教社团、配偶选择等等方面。第四章的内容为海外印度人与海外华人对母国的影响。第五章中印两国政府对各自的海外移民政策的一个简单比较。 华人“在新加坡的开发和建设中作出了不可磨灭的贡献”,印度人享有“新加坡建设者”的美誉。通过对新加坡两大移民族群的比较,我们发现,作为新加坡第一和第三大族群,新加坡的华人与印度人在诸多方面如移民的历程、奋斗过程、与各自母国的联系上等具有较大的相似性;当然,从不同宗教、民族背景移民至新加坡的这两支族群也存在较大的差异,整体上华人在经济实力上、社会地位上要强于印度人,在宗教社团、婚姻上要自由些;微观层面,印度人在教育文化水平上要高于华人;两支族群的差异随着时间的推移在不同的历史时期有较大的变化,比如在英国殖民统治时期,印度人的经济实力要优于华人,以印度齐智人高利贷者为典型。新加坡的海外印度人与海外华人表面上并无冲突、但在中印两国暗中较劲的大背景下实则为潜在的竞争对手关系。这两大人口族群对新加坡、对印度、对中国三个国家的长远发展都将产生重大的影响。 总之,印度人与华人,作为新加坡开发与建设的两支重大族群,具有较强的可比性,本文正是基于这一点,在学术界兴起将海外印度人与海外华人作比较研究的热潮的时刻,选择东南亚的新加坡为个案作比较研究。
[Abstract]:Overseas Chinese and overseas Indians, as two large groups of immigrants in the world, are undoubtedly a feat in the history of global migration. At the same time, these two ethnic groups are closely related to China and India, which are different and more similar, so they are comparable. Based on the analysis of the history and present situation of overseas Indians and overseas Chinese immigrants to Singapore, this paper makes a comparative study on the causes of migration, economic strength, culture and education, religious belief, spouse selection mode, competitiveness and immigration (expatriate) policies between China and India, and selects the original English works and the report on the official website of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of India. It also refers to the previous research results. The structure of this paper is as follows: the first chapter is the introduction, explaining the reasons for the selected topic, several basic concepts involved in this paper, the current research status and the research methods and significance of this paper. The second chapter introduces the basic situation of overseas Indians and overseas Chinese, Singapore, mainly introduces the distribution and current situation of the two immigration groups in Southeast Asia and Singapore. The third chapter is the focus of this paper, mainly the comparative study between Indians and Chinese in Singapore, involving economic strength, occupation and social status, culture and education, religious associations, spouse choice and so on. The fourth chapter is about the influence of overseas Indians and overseas Chinese on their home countries. The fifth chapter is a simple comparison between the Chinese and Indian governments on their overseas immigration policies. The Chinese have made indelible contributions to the development and construction of Singapore, and Indians enjoy the reputation of "Singapore builders". Through the comparison of the two major migrant groups in Singapore, we find that, as the first and third largest ethnic groups in Singapore, the Chinese and Indians in Singapore have great similarities in many aspects, such as the process of immigration, the process of struggle, and the connection with their respective home countries. Of course, there are also great differences between the two ethnic groups emigrating from different religions and ethnic backgrounds to Singapore. On the whole, the economic strength and social status of the Chinese are stronger than those of the Indians, and the religious associations and marriages are freer. At the micro level, Indians are higher than the Chinese in the level of education and culture. The differences between the two ethnic groups have changed greatly in different historical periods with the passage of time. For example, during the British colonial rule, the economic strength of Indians was better than that of Chinese. There is no apparent conflict between overseas Indians and overseas Chinese in Singapore, but it is a potential competitor against the backdrop of a covert struggle between China and India. These two major population groups will have a significant impact on Singapore, India and the long-term development of the three countries in China. In a word, Indians and Chinese, as two major ethnic groups developed and built in Singapore, have a strong comparability. Based on this, this paper chooses Singapore in Southeast Asia as a case study at a time when the academic community is on the rise to make comparative studies between overseas Indians and overseas Chinese.
【学位授予单位】：云南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2010
【分类号】：K339
本文编号：2500717
[Abstract]:Overseas Chinese and overseas Indians, as two large groups of immigrants in the world, are undoubtedly a feat in the history of global migration. At the same time, these two ethnic groups are closely related to China and India, which are different and more similar, so they are comparable. Based on the analysis of the history and present situation of overseas Indians and overseas Chinese immigrants to Singapore, this paper makes a comparative study on the causes of migration, economic strength, culture and education, religious belief, spouse selection mode, competitiveness and immigration (expatriate) policies between China and India, and selects the original English works and the report on the official website of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of India. It also refers to the previous research results. The structure of this paper is as follows: the first chapter is the introduction, explaining the reasons for the selected topic, several basic concepts involved in this paper, the current research status and the research methods and significance of this paper. The second chapter introduces the basic situation of overseas Indians and overseas Chinese, Singapore, mainly introduces the distribution and current situation of the two immigration groups in Southeast Asia and Singapore. The third chapter is the focus of this paper, mainly the comparative study between Indians and Chinese in Singapore, involving economic strength, occupation and social status, culture and education, religious associations, spouse choice and so on. The fourth chapter is about the influence of overseas Indians and overseas Chinese on their home countries. The fifth chapter is a simple comparison between the Chinese and Indian governments on their overseas immigration policies. The Chinese have made indelible contributions to the development and construction of Singapore, and Indians enjoy the reputation of "Singapore builders". Through the comparison of the two major migrant groups in Singapore, we find that, as the first and third largest ethnic groups in Singapore, the Chinese and Indians in Singapore have great similarities in many aspects, such as the process of immigration, the process of struggle, and the connection with their respective home countries. Of course, there are also great differences between the two ethnic groups emigrating from different religions and ethnic backgrounds to Singapore. On the whole, the economic strength and social status of the Chinese are stronger than those of the Indians, and the religious associations and marriages are freer. At the micro level, Indians are higher than the Chinese in the level of education and culture. The differences between the two ethnic groups have changed greatly in different historical periods with the passage of time. For example, during the British colonial rule, the economic strength of Indians was better than that of Chinese. There is no apparent conflict between overseas Indians and overseas Chinese in Singapore, but it is a potential competitor against the backdrop of a covert struggle between China and India. These two major population groups will have a significant impact on Singapore, India and the long-term development of the three countries in China. In a word, Indians and Chinese, as two major ethnic groups developed and built in Singapore, have a strong comparability. Based on this, this paper chooses Singapore in Southeast Asia as a case study at a time when the academic community is on the rise to make comparative studies between overseas Indians and overseas Chinese.
【学位授予单位】：云南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2010
【分类号】：K339
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前4条
1 庄国土;海外贸易和南洋开发与闽南华侨出国的关系──兼论华侨出国的原因[J];华侨华人历史研究;1994年02期
2 郭梁;试论东南亚华人企业集团的发展和前景[J];华侨华人历史研究;1997年04期
3 庄国土;论东南亚的华族[J];世界民族;2002年03期
4 刘华;中国共产党与新中国侨务事业[J];中共中央党校学报;2005年01期
，本文编号：2500717
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/xifanglishiwenhua/2500717.html
最近更新
教材专著
