认知负荷和预期性对情绪启动和语义启动的影响

发布时间：2018-07-02 09:45

本文选题：认知负荷 + 预期性　；参考：《河北师范大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：一方面,已有的研究多是对情绪启动和语义启动进行的独立研究,把两者结合到同一实验环境中直接比较的研究相对较少,而且研究者通常使用不同的实验任务,所以出现启动效应的效果有所不同。另一方面,有关预期的行为研究大多采用自我报告法对情绪进行测量。情绪的主观评定不能完全反映某些无意识的情绪变化。因此,本文采用相同的实验材料、相同的实验任务,在不同的认知负荷任务和不同的预期条件下,考察情绪启动和语义启动的异同。共有两个实验,实验一和实验二均需要完成评价判断任务和性别分类任务。实验一在不同的认知负荷任务中,采用图-图实验形式,设置SOA=250ms,探索在情绪启动和语义启动中,被试的反应是否具有差异性以及出现哪些差异。实验二在不同的预期条件下,采用图-图实验形式,设置SOA=250ms,探索在情绪启动和语义启动中,被试的反应是否具有差异性以及出现哪些差异。结果表明:(1)语义启动更加容易受到情绪信息的影响,而语义信息对情绪启动的影响作用较小。(2)在高认知负荷任务组,情绪启动受到情绪/语义匹配性组合的影响作用弱于语义启动受到的影响作用。(3)预期作用主要影响情绪启动,而对语义启动的影响相对较少。
[Abstract]:On the one hand, most of the existing studies are independent studies on emotional and semantic priming. There are relatively few studies that directly compare the two studies in the same experimental environment, and researchers usually use different experimental tasks. So the effect of priming effect is different. On the other hand, self-report method is used to measure emotion in the study of anticipatory behavior. Subjective assessment of emotions does not fully reflect some unconscious emotional changes. Therefore, using the same experimental materials and the same experimental tasks, we investigate the similarities and differences between emotional priming and semantic priming under different cognitive load tasks and different expected conditions. There are two experiments. Both experiment 1 and experiment 2 need to complete the task of evaluation and gender classification. In experiment 1, in different cognitive load tasks, we set up 250 msof SOA in the form of graph-graph experiment, and explored whether or not there were differences in the responses of the subjects in emotional priming and semantic priming. In experiment 2, under different expected conditions, we set up the SOA 250ms in the form of graph-graph experiment, and explored whether the responses of the subjects were different and what differences they had in emotional priming and semantic priming. The results show that: (1) semantic priming is more susceptible to emotional information, while semantic information has less effect on emotional priming. (2) in high cognitive load task group, Emotional priming is less influenced by the combination of emotion and semantic matching than by semantic priming. (3) the expected effect mainly affects emotional priming, but the effect on semantic priming is relatively small.
【学位授予单位】：河北师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：B842.6

【相似文献】