乐观与悲观归因风格大学生对情绪信息的注意偏向
发布时间：2018-10-23 18:14
【摘要】：目的:探讨乐观与悲观归因风格大学生对情绪信息的注意偏向特点。方法:通过网上招募83名大学生[乐观组43名(20男,23女),悲观组40名(20男,20女],采用2线索效度(有效、无效)×2情绪类型(正性、负性)×2组别(乐观组、悲观组)的混合实验设计,运用线索-靶子范式研究乐观与悲观归因风格大学生对情绪信息的注意偏向特点。结果:有效条件下,乐观组对正性靶刺激反应较悲观组更快[(311.4±26.6)ms vs.(324.1±47.0)ms,P0.05],而两组对负性靶刺激反应的差异无统计学意义(P0.05);无效条件下,乐观组对负性靶刺激的反应快于悲观组[(331.0±31.7)ms vs.(337.4±50.0)ms,P0.05],而两组对正性靶刺激反应的差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:乐观个体与悲观个体分别对正性信息与负性信息存在选择性注意偏向。
[Abstract]:Objective: to explore the characteristics of attention bias to emotional information in college students with optimistic and pessimistic attributional styles. Methods: 83 college students were recruited online [43 optimistic group (20 men, 23 women), 40 pessimistic group (20 men, 20 women), 2 cues validity (effective, ineffective) 脳 2 emotional type (positive, negative) 脳 2 group (optimistic group). Using the cue-target paradigm to study the characteristics of the attention bias of optimistic and pessimistic attributional style to emotional information. Results: under the effective condition, the positive target stimulus response of the optimistic group was faster than that of the pessimistic group [(311.4 卤26.6) ms vs. (卤47.0) ms,P0.05], but there was no significant difference between the two groups in the negative target stimulus response (P0.05); The response of the optimistic group to the negative target stimulation was faster than that of the pessimistic group [(331.0 卤31.7) ms vs. (337.4 卤50.0) ms,P0.05], but there was no significant difference between the two groups in the response to the positive target stimulus (P0.05). Conclusion: optimistic individuals and pessimistic individuals have selective attention bias to positive and negative information respectively.
【作者单位】： 深圳大学情绪与社会神经科学研究所;深圳大学心理与社会学院;
【基金】：国家自然科学基金(81471376;31530031) 国家973项目(2014CB744600) 深圳大学学生创新发展基金项目(16XSCX02)
【分类号】：B842.6
[Abstract]:Objective: to explore the characteristics of attention bias to emotional information in college students with optimistic and pessimistic attributional styles. Methods: 83 college students were recruited online [43 optimistic group (20 men, 23 women), 40 pessimistic group (20 men, 20 women), 2 cues validity (effective, ineffective) 脳 2 emotional type (positive, negative) 脳 2 group (optimistic group). Using the cue-target paradigm to study the characteristics of the attention bias of optimistic and pessimistic attributional style to emotional information. Results: under the effective condition, the positive target stimulus response of the optimistic group was faster than that of the pessimistic group [(311.4 卤26.6) ms vs. (卤47.0) ms,P0.05], but there was no significant difference between the two groups in the negative target stimulus response (P0.05); The response of the optimistic group to the negative target stimulation was faster than that of the pessimistic group [(331.0 卤31.7) ms vs. (337.4 卤50.0) ms,P0.05], but there was no significant difference between the two groups in the response to the positive target stimulus (P0.05). Conclusion: optimistic individuals and pessimistic individuals have selective attention bias to positive and negative information respectively.
【作者单位】： 深圳大学情绪与社会神经科学研究所;深圳大学心理与社会学院;
【基金】：国家自然科学基金(81471376;31530031) 国家973项目(2014CB744600) 深圳大学学生创新发展基金项目(16XSCX02)
【分类号】：B842.6
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前9条
1 吴晓刚;施亮;李乐源;张炎炎;潘发达;;返回抑制加工中情绪效应的分离[J];中国临床心理学杂志;2016年04期
2 曾庆巍;刘爱书;;情绪对注意选择性的影响:注意偏向和注意瞬脱[J];中国临床心理学杂志;2015年03期
3 杨文辉;周烃;彭芳;刘海洪;;湖南省岳阳县青少年抑郁的流行病学调查[J];中国临床心理学杂志;2013年06期
4 俎海珍;卢国华;董兰;吴青;;大学生归因风格、应激性生活事件与抑郁的关系[J];中国健康心理学杂志;2011年07期
5 黄宇霞;罗跃嘉;;负性情绪刺激是否总是优先得到加工:ERP研究[J];心理学报;2009年09期
6 戴琴;冯正直;戴勤素;;抑郁与归因方式关系研究[J];中国健康心理学杂志;2009年03期
7 苏丽娜;刘永芳;;工作应激与个体归因特点关系的研究[J];心理科学;2006年04期
8 白露,马慧,黄宇霞,罗跃嘉;中国情绪图片系统的编制——在46名中国大学生中的试用[J];中国心理卫生杂志;2005年11期
9 王纯,张宁;抑郁的归因理论与归因训练[J];中国心理卫生杂志;2004年06期
相关博士学位论文 前2条
1 李丹;抑郁症患者反应抑制和情绪冲突的ERP及fMRI研究[D];重庆医科大学;2014年
2 郭海儒;注意的生成机制与视觉注意计算模型研究[D];北京邮电大学;2012年
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 李o，
本文编号：2290078
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/xinlixingwei/2290078.html
