“一带一路”建设与公司准据法的确定

发布时间：2018-08-13 12:19

【摘要】：公司准据法确定的根本思路在于,将公司内部事务主义作为其基本规范立场以实现公司自治和投资自由化,通过非结论式正面清单合理界定内部事务主义的规范范围,同时在特定的条件下保留对内部事务主义的规范例外,形成对公司自治的限制和维护投资安全和利益。《中华人民共和国涉外民事关系法律适用法》相关规定的设计和表达未能完整体现这一思路,当文本表现出规范立场的摇摆不定和规范范围的模糊不清时,司法实践呈现出的就是裁判的乱象丛生。这也难以为"一带一路"建设提供公正高效权威的法律保障。解决上述问题的具体路径是,提炼公司准据法规范范围中所列举事项的内在关联性和分类标准,将现有的客观标准主观化,合理设定公司准据法的规范范围;在坚持将内部事务主义作为公司准据法确定的基本规范立场的同时,为防止法律的滥用和应对虚假外国公司,应明确针对内部事务主义的适用作出旨在保护第三方利益或者社会公共利益的限制性规定。
[Abstract]:The basic idea of the company applicable law is to take the internal affairs of the company as its basic normative position in order to realize corporate autonomy and investment liberalization, and to reasonably define the normative scope of the internal affairs doctrine through the non-conclusive positive list. While retaining the normative exception to internal affairs under certain conditions, Forming restrictions on corporate autonomy and safeguarding investment security and interests. The design and expression of the relevant provisions of the Law of the people's Republic of China on Civil Relations concerning Foreign Affairs have not fully reflected this idea. When the text shows the uncertainty of the normative position and the ambiguity of the normative scope, judicial practice presents the confusion of the referee. It is also difficult to provide a fair and efficient legal guarantee for the construction of Belt and Road. The specific way to solve the above problems is to refine the internal relevance and classification standard of the items listed in the scope of applicable company law, to subjectize the existing objective standards, and to reasonably set the normative scope of the applicable law of the company; While insisting on the position of internal affairs as the basic norm established by the applicable law of companies, in order to prevent the abuse of the law and to deal with false foreign companies, Restrictive provisions aimed at protecting the interests of third parties or the public interest should be made with regard to the application of internal affairs.
【作者单位】：北京师范大学法学院;
【基金】：教育部人文社科规划基金项目“中国涉外经济法律体系的重构”(项目批准号:15YJA820031)阶段性研究成果 “中央高校基本科研业务费用专项资金资助”
【分类号】：D997

【相似文献】