疑古思潮与20世纪《春秋》学研究

发布时间：2018-01-20 23:03

本文关键词： 疑古世纪《春秋》学研究得失影响　出处：《求索》2014年01期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：经过梳理20世纪疑古派关于《春秋》经性质,三传真伪、作者与成书时代等问题的基本观点,可见其击中了很多传统说法的漏洞、总结了《春秋》辨伪史,但对《春秋》经传多方面的价值认识不足、对传统《春秋》学没有做出全面正确的分析评价,可谓得失相参。在此基础上,揭示了疑古派的研究对20世纪《春秋》学的巨大影响,即内容上使《春秋》性质,三传作者、成书时代等问题成了热点问题,开创了《春秋》学史以及关于《春秋》经传历史文化、文学、思想、语言文字等多方面的研究;思维方式上一方面终结今古文之争,破除了迷信与权威,另一方面则形成了轻疑的学术风气。
[Abstract]:After combing the basic viewpoints of the "Spring and Autumn period" on the nature of the "Spring and Autumn", the "three legends", the author and the time of the book, it can be seen that it hit the loopholes of many traditional theories and summed up the history of "Spring and Autumn" discrimination. But the value of the "Spring and Autumn" transmission of the various aspects of the lack of understanding, the traditional "Spring and Autumn" study did not make a comprehensive and correct analysis and evaluation, it can be said to be related to the gains and losses. On this basis. This paper reveals the great influence of the research on the study of the Spring and Autumn period in 20th century, that is, the nature of the Spring and Autumn period, the author of the three biographies, and the era of the book become hot issues in the content. Initiated the study history of "Spring and Autumn" and the study of history, culture, literature, thought, language and other aspects of "Spring and Autumn"; On the one hand, the way of thinking ends the dispute between ancient and ancient prose and breaks down superstition and authority, on the other hand, it forms a dubious academic atmosphere.
【作者单位】：四川大学古籍整理研究所;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金项目资助(13CZX039) 教育部人文社会科学研究青年项目(10YJC720060) 四川省哲学社会科学重点研究基地儒学研究中心一般项目(RX12Y08)阶段性成果
【分类号】：K225
【正文快照】： 晚清今文经学重新兴起,在与古文经学争胜的过程中,大兴疑古辨伪。这种疑古之风,在“五四”新文化运动的影响下,20世纪20年代与西方的实证主义结合,催生了甄别、辨伪先秦两汉古籍的“古史辨”运动。从晚清今文经学到“古史辨”运动的疑古思潮,对《春秋》学研究产生了重要影响。

【参考文献】