谁是大唐王朝的真正缔造者

发布时间：2018-03-29 03:23

本文选题：唐朝　切入点：缔造者　出处：《社会科学战线》2014年07期

【摘要】：近年来,有一种观点逐渐占据了学界的主流地位:唐太宗并不像史书所载那样功高盖世,李渊为缔造大唐王朝和统一中原所建树的功勋不容置疑,史书有关李渊父子功过的记载存在着严重的倾向于唐太宗的曲笔。其论据主要有二:一是《大唐创业起居注》;二是有人认为李渊属于《孙子》所说的"不战而屈人之兵,善之善者也"。而文章认为,史书所载虽不无曲笔,但《大唐创业起居注》曲笔之处尤多。书中吹捧神化李渊之语随处可见,且多有不合逻辑与自相矛盾之处,其严谨程度与可信性远不如两唐书等正史。至于第二条论据,则纯系对《孙子》理论的误读。故正史所载虽不无偏颇曲笔之处,但唐太宗的历史功绩却不容抹杀,只有他才是大唐王朝的真正缔造者和天下一统局面的开创者。
[Abstract]:In recent years, there is a view that gradually occupy the mainstream of the academic community: Tang Taizong is not as high as the history books, Li Yuan for the creation of the Tang Dynasty and the reunification of the Central Plains, the achievements of the achievements of no doubt, There are two main arguments in the historical records about the merits and demerits of Li Yuan's father and son. The main arguments are as follows: first, "the Tang Dynasty Entrepreneurship and living Note"; and second, some people think that Li Yuan belongs to the "soldiers who do not fight and subjugate people" as described in "Sun Tzu". And the article holds that although there are not no qu pens in the history books, there are more and more qu pens in the Tang Dynasty. The language of hypnotizing Li Yuan can be seen everywhere in the book, and there are illogical and contradictory points in it. As for the second argument, it is purely a misreading of the "Sun Tzu" theory. Therefore, although the official history contains some biased writings, the historical achievements of the Emperor Taizong cannot be obliterated. Only he was the real founder of the Tang Dynasty and the pioneer of the unification of the world.
【作者单位】：吉林省社会科学院高句丽研究室;
【分类号】：K242

【共引文献】