清代吴派学术研究

发布时间：2018-06-25 15:53

本文选题：清代 + 吴派　；参考：《华东师范大学》2007年博士论文

【摘要】： 明清之际，学界掀起了“理学清算”浪潮，批判宋明理学，倡扬汉代经学。在此学风浸染之下，清初至乾嘉间，以惠周惕、惠士奇、惠栋及其弟子江声、余萧客等为代表的一批吴地学人，批判宋明理学的侈言义理，以汉学倡于江南，系一代学风际会之所在，是称吴派。本文以前贤时哲的研究论著为起点，通过仔细研读吴派学者的学术专著，审视、评价各家的学说见解，从时空的跨度、学域的深度、交游的广度对吴派学术作一铰系统的学术史梳理，期于认识吴派学术的整体面貌，进而深入地理解明清学术所经历的从理学到汉学的转型。论文分为绪言、正文和结论三个部分。绪言部分对研究对象、写作思路和选题意义作了一定说明，并简要回顾了学界研究状况。结论对正文记述进行总结概括。正文内容大致包含吴派学人(域)的个案研究、吴派治学风格与特点以及吴派学术的辐射与回响三个层面，分七个章节展开论述。第一章至第五章围绕吴派学人的治学领域与学术专著展开，在个案分析的基础上揭示吴派汉学家的学术特点。第一章首先依据《惠氏宗谱》稽考东吴惠氏的相关资料，梳理惠氏的家学传承，并简述了惠有声、惠周惕论学的特质所在。第二章以吴派奠基者惠士奇为考察对象，以原始文献考论为基础，钩沉其“罚修镇江城”一事；通过《易说》、《春秋说》内容考述惠士奇的学说思想；惠氏学说上承清初理学清算浪潮，下启乾嘉复兴汉学之风，，尤其开启了吴派汉学的治学风尚。第三章是论文的重点章节，集中探讨惠栋的学说。惠栋为吴派学术之巨擘，其《易》学、《尚书》学研究，奠定了吴派汉学之根基，确立了吴派学术的整体走向。惠栋以《荀子微言》为代表的诸子学研究、以《后汉书补注》为代表的史学研究在相关领域均占有重要的一席。作为一个“考据学家”，惠栋具有明确的“通经致用”思想，其治学理念中蕴涵着深邃的经世关怀。第四章通过分析江声的《尚书集注音疏》及余萧客的《古经解钩沉》，剖析其中所折射出的学术观念。江、余二人的治学旨趣均秉承惠栋，加以拓展、深入而成专门之学。在吴派的发展过程中，江、余之学显然代表着一个重要阶段。第五章以《汉学师承记》为考察中心，旨在论述吴派殿军江藩的“纯汉学”思想。第六章主要从“六经尊服郑、百行法程朱”的“汉宋学论”、汉学家的“学术道德”观以及清代“实事求是”学风等三个方面阐述吴派的学术内涵与精神主旨，探讨吴派的学术风格与特点。第七章的主题在于说明吴派的学术辐射与回响，侧重考论惠栋与戴震、钱大昕、王鸣盛等汉学家的交游论学，并辨析了惠氏学说与常州学派的关系。
[Abstract]:During the Ming and Qing dynasties, scholars set off a wave of "Neo-Confucianism liquidation", criticizing Song Ming Neo-Confucianism and advocating Confucian Classics in the Han Dynasty. Under the influence of this style of study, from the beginning of the Qing Dynasty to the Qianjia period, a group of Wu Di scholars, such as Hui Chou Ti, Hui Shi Qi, Hui Dong and his disciples Jiang Sheng and Yu Xiaoke, criticized the theory of extravagance of Song Ming Neo-Confucianism and advocated it in Jiangnan with Sinology. Department of a generation of intergroup, is called Wu School. This paper starts with the research works of former sages and philosophers, by carefully studying the academic monographs of Wu School scholars, examining and evaluating the opinions of various schools of thought, from the span of time and space, and from the depth of the academic field. The breadth of friendship combs the academic history of Wu school, which is based on the understanding of the overall appearance of Wu school, and the further understanding of the transformation from Neo-Confucianism to Sinology experienced by the scholars in Ming and Qing dynasties. The paper is divided into three parts: introduction, text and conclusion. The preface explains the object of study, writing ideas and significance of the topic, and briefly reviews the current situation of academic research. Conclusion the main body description is summarized. The text contains the case study of Wu school scholars, the style and characteristics of Wu school scholarship, and the radiation and echo of Wu school academic, which is divided into seven chapters. The first to fifth chapters focus on the academic field and monographs of Wu school scholars, and reveal the academic characteristics of Wu school sinologists on the basis of case study. The first chapter firstly combs Wyeth's family heritage according to the relevant data of Wyeth pedigree, and briefly describes the characteristics of Hui Yousheng and Hui Ti's theory. The second chapter takes Hui Shiqi, the founder of Wu School, as the object of investigation, based on the textual research theory of the original literature, and recites the matter of "punishing and repairing Zhenjiang City"; The theory of Wyeth inherits the wave of Neo-Confucianism in the early Qing Dynasty, which brings about the revival of Sinology in Qianjia, and especially opens the style of studying Sinology in Wu School. The third chapter is the key chapter of the paper, focusing on the theory of Huidong. Huidong is a great scholar of Wu school, whose study of Yi Yi and Shang Shu has laid the foundation of Wu school's Sinology and established the whole trend of Wu school's learning. Huidong, represented by Xunzi Wei Yan, holds an important place in the related fields. As a "textual scholar", Huidong has a clear thought of "making use of the Tongjing", which contains profound concern for the world. In the fourth chapter, the author analyzes Jiangsheng's notes on the collection of Shang Shu and Yu Xiaoke's explanation of the ancient classics, and analyzes the academic ideas reflected in it. Jiang, Yu's academic purport of Huidong, to expand, in-depth and into a special school. In the development of Wu School, Jiang, Yu Zhixue clearly represented an important stage. The fifth chapter focuses on Sinology as the center of investigation, aiming at discussing the Wu School Dianjun Jiangfan's "pure Sinology" thought. The sixth chapter mainly expounds the academic connotation and spiritual purport of Wu school from three aspects: "six Classics veneration Zheng, hundred lines Cheng Zhu" Han and Song studies "," academic morality "of Sinologists and" seeking truth from facts "style of study in Qing Dynasty. This paper discusses the academic style and characteristics of Wu School. The theme of the seventh chapter is to explain the academic radiation and reverberation of Wu School, focusing on Huidong and Dai Zhen, Qian Daxin, Wang Mingsheng and other Sinologists' theory of friendship, and to distinguish and analyze the relationship between Wyeth theory and Changzhou school.
【学位授予单位】：华东师范大学
【学位级别】：博士
【学位授予年份】：2007
【分类号】：K249

【参考文献】