门户之见、文化宰制对理学传播的负面影响——考察《四库全书》不收录清前期《近思录》注本的原因

发布时间：2018-09-08 07:41

【摘要】：清前期《近思录》代表性注本甚多,《四库全书》仅收入了茅星来《近思录集注》、江永《近思录集注》,而对于当时影响力甚至超越二者的施璜《发明》、张伯行《集解》等注本却未收录。从政治、学术、文化思想层面解析其背后的复杂因素,发现施、张二人注本的出现、广布,符合社会多层面需要;但"汉学专制"局面、汉宋门户之见,使得非汉学考据家的著述难以受到关注,清代的文化宰制对《四库》选书有着至关重要的影响,往往因人而废其言、弃其书。而茅、江二人注本被选入的主因,不仅关乎其本身呈现出的考据特色,而且得益于时代思潮相助与汉学家推重。《近思录》文献在清代的流布呈亚铃状的情形,与乾嘉时期政治、学术思想的转变、过分尊汉抑宋、君王文化摧残不无关系。
[Abstract]:In the early Qing Dynasty, there were a lot of representative notes on "recent thinking record". The "Siku Guanshu" only included Mao Xinglai, Jiang Yong "recent thinking record Collection", and even exceeded the influence of both of them at that time, Zhang Boxing < set]. Solution > isobaric note is not included. By analyzing the complex factors behind it from the political, academic, cultural and ideological levels, it is found that the emergence of Shi and Zhang Erren's notes, which are widely distributed, meet the needs of the society at various levels; but in the "autocratic Sinology" situation, the Han and Song dynasties have their own views. It is difficult to pay attention to the works of non-Sinological textual writers. The culture system of Qing Dynasty has a vital influence on the selection of books in Siku, and it is often abandoned because of people. The main reason why Mao and Jiang Erren's notes were selected was not only related to their own textual research features, but also benefited from the help of the trend of thought of the times and the emphasis of Sinologists. The distribution of documents in the Qing Dynasty was subringing, and the politics of the Qianjia period. The change of academic thought, excessive respect for Han and Song dynasties, King culture destruction is not irrelevant.
【作者单位】：温州大学人文学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金重大招标项目《朱子学文献整理与研究》的阶段性研究成果。课题编号:11&ZD087
【分类号】：K249

【参考文献】